0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Food & Water Human Health Effects Nanoplastics Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Why Was My Manuscript Rejected without Review? Focus on Public Health and Environmental Exposures, Ecotoxicology, and Micro/Nanoplastics

Environmental Science & Technology 2025 1 citation ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Daniel Schlenk, Pablo Gago-Ferrero, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Huahong Shi, Bin Wang, Xiaowei Zhang, Margaret A. Mills

Summary

This editorial from Environmental Science and Technology outlines common reasons manuscripts in the fields of public health exposures, ecotoxicology, and micro/nanoplastics are rejected without review. The authors describe the journal's expectations for scientific rigor, including appropriate experimental design, quality controls, and analytical methods. The piece serves as guidance for researchers submitting work in these rapidly growing fields to improve manuscript quality and align with publication standards.

Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a high-impact, broad-reaching interdisciplinary environmental science and technology journal dedicated to investigating the depth, complexity, and sustainability of our environment and the development of new technologies to support that sustainability. The journal has a core commitment to remain a thought leader, publishing the latest advances of high novelty that significantly move the field forward in new directions and discoveries. Alongside this aim comes implicit expectations of excellence and quality, and these high standards underpin ES&T’s ability to publish the most important and impactful research advances in environmental science and technology. ES&T receives many thousands of submissions each year. Selecting which papers move through the initial assessment made by our team of expert Executive and Associate Editors and onto external peer review is based on whether the manuscript contains the basic expectations of quality for a given research field. General guidance for what ES&T is seeking in quality submissions was described in the editorial Why my Paper Was Rejected Without Review and includes fundamental expectations of appropriate scientific rigor, sound experimental setup and reporting, replicate samples, treatment groups and controls, analytical quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC), and other key considerations. However, for a given research topic within the broad umbrella of environmental science and technology there are also quality expectations unique to that particular field. This editorial provides insights into the basic quality expectations for submissions in public health and environmental exposures, ecotoxicology, and micro/nanoplastics research.

Share this paper