0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Aerosol mass concentrations and dry/wet deposition of atmospheric microplastics at a remote coastal location in New Zealand

Environmental Pollution 2025 7 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 53 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Joel D. Rindelaub, Wenxia Fan, Joel D. Rindelaub, Joel D. Rindelaub, Jennifer Salmond, Gordon M. Miskelly, Jennifer Salmond, Jennifer Salmond, Wenxia Fan, Kim N. Dirks, Wenxia Fan, Gordon M. Miskelly, Gordon M. Miskelly, Kim N. Dirks, Gordon M. Miskelly, Joel D. Rindelaub, Silvia Henning, Silvia Henning, Thomas Conrath, Thomas Conrath, Frank Stratmann Guy Coulson, Guy Coulson, Frank Stratmann

Summary

Researchers quantified airborne microplastic concentrations at a remote coastal site in southern New Zealand using both active and passive sampling methods. They found plastics comprised at least 0.14% of total suspended particulate mass, with air trajectory analysis suggesting the Southern Ocean as a source. The study indicates that counting microplastics by number alone may significantly underestimate true atmospheric plastic pollution, since the smallest and most abundant particles escape microscopic detection.

Study Type Environmental

This study quantified airborne microplastic concentrations by mass and number counts using both active and passive sampling at a remote coastal location in Southern New Zealand. Seven polymers were quantified using pyrolysis gas chromatography mass spectrometry (Pyr-GC/MS) in atmospheric samples, finding that plastics comprised at least 0.14 % of total suspended particulate mass at the remote coastal site. Air parcel back trajectories suggest that airborne microplastics at the site, observed at an average concentration of 65 ± 6 ng m<sup>-3</sup>, have origins from the Southern Ocean. Additionally, the results demonstrate that reporting atmospheric deposition of microplastics by number counts may underestimate the true amount of plastics present in samples, as size limitations associated with microscopic imaging do not allow for quantification of the most abundant sizes and types of environmental microplastics. With current uncertainties related to aerosol formation in the Southern Ocean and the associated impacts on climate forcing, further research is urgently needed on the production of airborne microplastics originating from the Southern Ocean, a possible microplastic reservoir.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper