We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Microplastic mitigation in urban stormwater using green infrastructure: a review
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers reviewed green infrastructure technologies for removing microplastics from urban stormwater, finding bioretention systems achieve 80-99% removal efficiency, permeable pavements 89-96.6%, retention ponds 55-98%, and constructed wetlands 28-75%, with biochar amendments and integrated multi-system approaches offering the highest performance for particles across size ranges.
Microplastic pollution in aquatic environments has emerged as a significant environmental concern, posing risks to ecosystems and human health. Urban stormwater runoff has been identified as a major source of microplastics, with microplastic concentrations reaching up to six times higher than those in wastewater treatment plant effluents. Given the increasing urbanization and inadequate waste management, effective mitigation strategies are urgently needed to prevent the discharge of microplastics into natural water systems. Green infrastructure, designed for sustainable stormwater management, has gained attention as a promising approach to reducing microplastic pollution while providing additional environmental benefits. Here, we review various green infrastructure technologies, including bioretention systems, permeable pavements, stormwater ponds, and constructed wetlands, focusing on their effectiveness in microplastic mitigation. Bioretention systems exhibit removal efficiencies ranging from 80% to over 99%, and are particularly effective for particles sized 20 μm or above. Constructed wetlands achieve removal rates between 28 and 75%, effectively treating microplastics in the 100–500 μm range. Permeable pavements demonstrate removal efficiencies of 89–96.6%, especially for particles less than 100 μm. Retention ponds retain 55–98% of microplastics, with sediment retention reaching up to 85%. We found that the performance of these systems is influenced by soil amendments, vegetation, and adsorption-based mechanisms such as biochar applications, which can enhance removal to over 99% under optimized conditions. Phytoremediation with aquatic plants such as Lemna minor achieves a 76% removal rate, while biofilm-based strategies offer slower but potentially sustainable solutions. This review highlights the necessity of integrating multiple green infrastructure approaches to optimize microplastic removal.
More Papers Like This
Global Occurrence and Environmental Fate of Microplastics in Stormwater Runoff: Unlock the In-depth Knowledge on Nature-Based Removal Strategies
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers reviewed 45 studies on microplastic contamination in stormwater runoff published between 2020 and 2024, finding concentrations ranging from near zero to nearly 19,000 particles per liter, and recommending nature-based solutions such as bioretention cells, rain gardens, and constructed wetlands as cost-effective strategies for reducing urban microplastic discharge.
Micro-Nanoplastics from Stormwater Runoffs to Water Bodies: An In-Depth Investigation
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers investigated how stormwater runoff collects micro- and nanoplastics from urban surfaces — roads, rooftops, and construction sites — and delivers them in concentrated pulses to rivers, lakes, and coastal waters following rain events. Stormwater represents one of the largest and most direct conduits for terrestrial microplastic pollution to reach aquatic ecosystems and, ultimately, drinking water sources and seafood.
Microplastics as Emerging Pollutants in Urban Waterways
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examined microplastics as emerging pollutants in urban waterways, focusing on their sources, transport, association with toxic co-contaminants, and the health and ecological risks posed by their persistence in freshwater systems. Urban waterways concentrate microplastics from multiple city sources, creating exposure risks for communities relying on surface water and the aquatic organisms they consume.
Sources and Fate of Microplastics in Urban Systems
AI summary Read the abstract
Urban environments generate microplastics through road runoff, stormwater drainage, and inadequate waste management, releasing particles directly into local waterways at high concentrations. Cities are both major sources and exposure zones for microplastics, making urban infrastructure improvements a priority for reducing human contact with contaminated water and air.
Sources and Fate of Microplastics in Urban Systems
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers examined how microplastics enter and move through urban environments, tracing sources from personal care products, synthetic clothing, and infrastructure degradation to eventual fate in waterways — as global plastic production exceeds 380 million metric tons annually, cities are both major generators and transport corridors for microplastic pollution.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.