We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Responsibility and Allocation for Environmental Damage Caused by Marine Plastic
AI summary Read the abstract
Despite its title referencing marine plastic pollution and environmental damage, this paper is primarily a legal analysis of international treaty negotiations over plastic pollution responsibility — not a scientific study of microplastic pollution itself. It examines how national interests and industrial lobbying have stalled the International Plastics Convention and discusses frameworks for allocating environmental liability, and is not directly relevant to microplastic science or human health impacts.
The international community agreed to a binding treaty on marine plastic pollution, but after five INC negotiation rounds, no final deal was reached. Further discussions are scheduled for 2025. While it is regrettable that the International Plastics Convention remains unresolved, efforts to combat plastic pollution continue steadily. Negotiating international environmental conventions is challenging due to varying national circumstances. In the Plastics Convention, despite broad recognition of the need for an agreement, divisions over industrial interests hindered progress. The discussion about responsibility and allocation of environmental pollution revolves around determining who should bear the burden, and this topic is directly linked to national interests and can lead to conflicts of opinion between countries. Therefore, this article presents effective measures for responsibility and allocation that should be adopted in the new plastics convention to protect the marine environment from marine plastics.
More Papers Like This
Liability and Compensation for Marine Plastic Pollution: Conceptual Issues and Possible Ways Forward
AI summary Read the abstract
This paper reviews international legal frameworks for holding polluters liable for marine plastic pollution, finding that existing liability mechanisms are largely inadequate. Stronger international legal tools would create financial incentives for companies to reduce plastic waste before it reaches the ocean.
Challenges for Regulation and Management of Microplastic in Environment and Proposed Changes
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines failures in international law and national regulations to adequately address microplastic pollution in water bodies, arguing that recent treaty negotiations have been insufficient and proposing regulatory changes to better manage microplastics in the environment.
Liability Framework for Microplastic Pollution in Marine Ecosystems
AI summary Read the abstract
This legal analysis argues that current international treaties — including UNCLOS, MARPOL, and the Basel Convention — are too fragmented and vague to hold anyone accountable for microplastic pollution in the ocean. The authors identify critical gaps around attribution, lifecycle governance, and monitoring standards, and call for a binding global liability framework built around extended producer responsibility and uniform scientific standards. Without clearer rules about who is responsible and what they must do, widespread marine microplastic contamination is likely to continue unchecked.
Liability Framework for Microplastic Pollution in Marine Ecosystems
AI summary Read the abstract
This legal analysis argues that current international treaties — including UNCLOS, MARPOL, and the Basel Convention — are too fragmented and vague to hold anyone accountable for microplastic pollution in the ocean. The authors identify critical gaps around attribution, lifecycle governance, and monitoring standards, and call for a binding global liability framework built around extended producer responsibility and uniform scientific standards. Without clearer rules about who is responsible and what they must do, widespread marine microplastic contamination is likely to continue unchecked.
Marine plastic pollution governance: the role and challenges of international law
AI summary Read the abstract
A review of international legal frameworks for marine plastic pollution finds current governance fragmented and inadequate, calling for a lifecycle-based international legal regime to address the full chain of plastic production, use, and disposal. Strengthening international law is essential for systemic microplastic reduction, as ocean connectivity means that plastic—and the microplastics it becomes—cannot be managed effectively by individual nations alone.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.