We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
High microplastic pollution in birds of urban waterbodies revealed by non-invasively collected faecal samples
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers analyzed bird droppings from urban freshwater habitats in Germany and found microplastic particles, mainly fibers, in 98% of samples across all species studied. The pollution levels were substantially higher than those reported in other freshwater bird studies, likely reflecting the heavy contamination of urban waterways. Since all the investigated species are at least partially migratory, the findings suggest birds may transport microplastics over long distances.
Plastic waste concentrates in aquatic environments, where wildlife can ingest or absorb it. In birds, plastic particles have been identified in hundreds of aquatic and terrestrial species leading to adverse effects. Most studies investigating microplastic pollution in birds use dead individuals or invasive techniques. However, microplastic ingestion can also be determined by analysing birds' faeces. There is a lack of information regarding microplastic pollution of birds inhabiting urban freshwaters, where very high pollution levels are expected. We analysed body condition of individual birds inhabiting freshwaters in the city of Münster (Germany) and microplastic contamination in their faeces. We found microplastic particles (mainly fibres) in all species (Mallard Anas platyrhynchos, Jack Snipe Lymnocryptes minimus, Black-headed Gull Chroicocephalus ridibundus and Common Moorhen Gallinula chloropus) and most samples (98 %). Microplastic pollution ranged from 0.26 to 72.03 particles per mg faeces. The observed microplastic pollution frequency and pollution levels were much higher compared to other studies of birds in freshwater environments, probably resulting from the high contamination of urban waters. We found no effect of the number of microplastic particles on body condition. As all investigated species are at least partially migratory, a long-distance transport of microplastic particles may increase the probability that migratory birds transport (and excrete) microplastic particles to remote locations that otherwise suffer from little anthropogenic pollution. We demonstrate that non-invasively collected faecal samples collected during bird ringing/banding can be used as indicators of microplastic pollution, and call for more studies investigating the effects of microplastics on birds - with a special focus on urban freshwaters.
More Papers Like This
Urban waterbirds shifting microplastics
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers found microplastics in the feces of two urban waterbird species in Kerala, India, with polyethylene, polypropylene, and polystyrene being the most common types. Both juvenile and adult birds were affected equally, suggesting that waterbirds can transport microplastics through ecosystems and serve as indicators of local plastic waste levels in freshwater environments.
Ingestion of anthropogenic particles by wild birds from urban riparian habitats.
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers examined droppings from six wild bird species near rivers in Coimbra, Portugal, finding suspected plastic or human-made particles in 43% of samples. Song thrushes had the highest levels, mostly filaments and fibers, and chemical testing confirmed some particles were plastic, suggesting thrushes could help track pollution in cities.
Occurrence and Distribution of Microplastics in Surface Water and Avian Feces Along an Urban River in Guanajuato, Mexico
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers measured tiny plastic particles in water along Mexico's Guanajuato River and in droppings from two local bird species. Plastic levels were higher during the rainy season, and a wastewater treatment plant removed over 94% of particles. Most plastics found in bird droppings matched those found in the river water.
Plastics and other anthropogenic debris in freshwater birds from Canada.
AI summary Read the abstract
This study quantified plastic debris ingestion in 17 freshwater and one marine bird species across Canada, finding that over 11% of individuals had ingested anthropogenic debris. The results show that plastic pollution in freshwater environments affects birds at rates comparable to marine species, highlighting the need to extend plastic pollution monitoring beyond the ocean.
Microplastic loading in terrestrial birds from nonlethal sampling
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers tested wild terrestrial birds in the USA for microplastics using two methods: examining digestive tracts from dead birds and collecting droppings from live, released birds. Both methods found microplastics, with dropping samples detecting lower but comparable amounts. Microplastic levels varied more by individual bird than by diet, foraging habits, or body size.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.