0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Estimating the emission of microplastics from urban surfaces into the atmosphere using the PI-SWERL

Journal of Hazardous Materials 2025 4 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Inês Leitão, Loes van Schaik, Dirk Goossens, A.J.D. Ferreira, Violette Geissen

Summary

Researchers measured microplastic concentrations on urban surfaces in Coimbra, Portugal and used a portable wind erosion device to simulate airborne emission under two wind speeds. Microplastic concentrations in soils ranged widely across land uses, with emission fluxes higher than previously reported—light winds were sufficient to erode lightweight particles smaller than 200 micrometers.

Microplastics (MPs) are a global concern, with the atmosphere being a key pathway for their transport. Understanding their sources is crucial for controlling MP dispersion. This study examines MPs on urban surfaces and their transport through wind erosion using a Portable In Situ Wind Erosion Laboratory (PI-SWERL) under two wind shear conditions. Material was collected in Coimbra, Portugal, from fourteen locations associated with different land uses. MPs number and types were determined with a stereomicroscope and micro Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscope (μ-FTIR), respectively. MP concentrations in soils ranged from 16 ± 4 particles•g to 327 ± 494 particles•g. Emission fluxes ranged from 5 ± 1 particles•m•s to 28 ± 4 particles•m•s, higher than previous reports. At 4000 revolutions per minute (RPM), enrichment ratio was 3 ± 17 MPs, and at 6000 RPM, 2 ± 6 MPs. A light wind can erode a significant amount of MPs. Light density MPs smaller than 200 μm eroded more easily. Emissions were highest on asphalt (22 ± 9.5 particles•m•s) and lowest on grass (8 ± 8.25 particles•m•s). Grass may help control MP dispersion. These findings can inform MP transport models and policies to mitigate contamination.

Share this paper