We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Effect of solution pH on nanoplastic adsorption onto soil particle surface and the aggregation of soil particles
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers tested how soil pH affects polystyrene nanoplastic adsorption onto soil particles, finding that the nanoplastics' strongly negative surface charge prevented self-aggregation across all pH levels but that they readily adsorbed onto soil particles with high surface area and positive charge — with adsorption altering the soil particles' own aggregation behavior in ways that will influence nanoplastic mobility through soil.
Nanoplastics (NPs) are increasingly recognized as an emerging threat to the geospheric environment, and the movement behavior of NPs in the geospheric environment should be clarified. The aggregation properties of NPs, their adsorption onto soil particle surfaces, and the aggregation properties of soil particles with adsorbed NPs are considered to affect their mobility in soil; however, these processes remain unclear. Here, polystyrene (PS) NP suspensions were agitated at pH 4, 7, and 10, and aggregate size of the PSNP was measured to clarify its homo-aggregation behavior. Additionally, batch experiments were conducted using PSNPs, fine sand, and soil in solutions of pH 4, 7, and 10 to clarify the PSNP adsorption and subsequent aggregation behaviors of the soil particles. The results demonstrated that the PSNPs used in this study did not aggregate even when the solution pH was changed because the negative value of the zeta potential was sufficiently large. The PSNPs adsorbed more onto soil particles with large specific surface areas and positive zeta potentials than that onto sand particles. The zeta potentials of the soil particles and PSNPs were influenced by the solution pH. Furthermore, the adsorption of PSNPs onto soil particles changed their aggregation properties. This study contributes to the understanding of the mobility of NPs in soil; however, further studies such as water flow experiments, simulations, and the effects of NPs on the food chain are required.
More Papers Like This
Transport of polystyrene nanoplastics in natural soils: Effect of soil properties, ionic strength and cation type
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers used column experiments across three soil types to show that polystyrene nanoplastic transport is governed by soil iron and aluminum oxide content and pH — with high-pH, low-oxide soils allowing up to 97% nanoplastic passage — and that calcium ions and higher ionic strength significantly increase retention, revealing that soil chemistry strongly controls nanoplastic mobility toward groundwater.
Attachment of positively and negatively charged submicron polystyrene plastics on nine typical soils
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers studied the attachment of positively and negatively charged submicron polystyrene plastics to nine typical soils, finding that surface charge significantly influences microplastic-soil interactions and retention in different soil types.
Mechanism of coupled phosphate‑calcium modulation of nanoplastic transport in porous media: Role of solution chemistry and surface interactions
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists used laboratory experiments and molecular simulations to study how phosphate and calcium ions in soil water affect whether polystyrene nanoplastics move freely through the ground or get trapped in soil particles. They found that pH was a key factor: at lower pH levels, phosphate helped nanoplastics travel farther while calcium restricted movement, with both effects linked to how these ions change the surface charge of both the particles and the soil. Understanding nanoplastic mobility in soil is essential for predicting contamination of groundwater and crops.
Influence of Concentration, Surface Charge, and Natural Water Components on the Transport and Adsorption of Polystyrene Nanoplastics in Sand Columns
AI summary Read the abstract
Laboratory column experiments showed that nanoplastics made of polystyrene behave very differently in groundwater depending on their surface charge — positively charged particles were retained much more readily in sand than negatively charged ones, and the presence of natural organic matter in real lake water reduced the retention of both types. These findings matter for understanding whether nanoplastics released into the environment will travel through soil and reach drinking water sources, which depends critically on the plastic's surface chemistry.
Effects of particle size and surface chemistry on plastic nanoparticle transport in saturated natural porous media.
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers studied how the size and surface chemistry of plastic nanoparticles affect how they move through soil and are taken up by plants. They found that smaller particles and those with certain surface charges moved more readily through soil and were more likely to enter plant roots. The results indicate that nanoplastic contamination of agricultural soils could lead to plant uptake and potential transfer into the food chain.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.