0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Utilizing aquatic environmental DNA to address global biodiversity targets

Nature Reviews Biodiversity 2025 35 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 63 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Florian Altermatt Luca Carraro, Florian Altermatt Marjorie Couton, Luca Carraro, Florian Altermatt Florian Altermatt François Keck, Florian Altermatt Lori Lawson Handley, Xiaowei Zhang, Xiaowei Zhang, Florian Leese, Xiaowei Zhang, Florian Leese, Yan Zhang, Rosetta C. Blackman, Xiaowei Zhang, Florian Altermatt

Summary

This review explores how environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis from water samples can help monitor aquatic biodiversity and track ecosystem health. While not directly about microplastics, eDNA technology is increasingly being adapted to study how plastic pollution affects aquatic ecosystems and species diversity. Better biodiversity monitoring tools help scientists understand the broader ecological impacts of microplastic contamination on the water systems that support human food and resources.

Achieving global biodiversity goals requires assessing, attributing and reversing the ongoing, unprecedented biodiversity decline in aquatic ecosystems, and relies on adequate data to inform policy and action. Analysis of environmental DNA (eDNA) has become established as a novel and powerful approach to assess the state and functioning of aquatic ecosystems, and although increasingly implemented by stakeholders its potential is not yet fully tapped. In this Perspective, we review the current state of aquatic eDNA research, focusing in particular on the policy relevance of eDNA and its utility in contributing towards the Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. We summarize key technological developments in eDNA science to measure organismal diversity, its potential for spatial and temporal upscaling to become a key reference for local to global biodiversity action, and the next steps needed to effectively implement eDNA for decision-making and reaching biodiversity targets. Using eDNA to support biodiversity assessment will particularly benefit the understanding of understudied ecosystems and allow the direct calculation of ecological indices and implementation of FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable) and inclusive data curation. Important next steps for eDNA require proper method standardization and commonly agreed quality standards, populating reference databases, and overcoming methodological constraints in retrofitting novel eDNA-based approaches to existing biodiversity monitoring approaches. Aquatic eDNA-based technologies offer the potential for universal and standardized biodiversity monitoring. In this Perspective, Altermatt et al. discuss how these technologies can help to achieve the targets of the Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework through informing appropriate policy and actions, and describe the next steps required for widespread and equitable use of these technologies.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper