We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Eco-friendly or eco-threat? The environmental risks of natural and semi-synthetic fibers
Summary
This review examines emerging evidence that natural and semi-synthetic textile fibers (cotton, viscose, wool) contribute significantly to environmental microfiber pollution, comparable in scale to synthetic fibers. The authors challenge assumptions of negligible ecological impact and call for natural and semi-synthetic fibers to be included in microplastic pollution assessments.
Abstract Microplastic synthetic fibre pollution from textile products has been a key focus of environmental research since the mid 2000s, with numerous investigations establishing their ubiquity in natural systems and the ecological threats they pose. Natural and semi-synthetic fibres, however, have been largely ignored due to assumptions of their negligible environmental impact and rapid degradation due to their natural material sources. There is, however, growing evidence of widespread pollution by natural and semi-synthetic microfibres, especially in aquatic environments, at levels equivalent to or exceeding those observed for synthetic microfibres. Difficulties in reliable identification and detection of microfibres in environmental samples has limited our knowledge and understanding of their presence, abundance and impacts; yet investigations into the ecological threats posed by these fibres suggest similar or even greater negative impacts on organisms than their synthetic counterparts. Here we briefly summarise the state of this emerging field and stress the importance for future research to focus on quantifying and assessing the threats posed by natural and semi-synthetic microfibre pollution alongside those from synthetic fibres.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Clothes Encounters of the Microfibre Kind
This review examines how natural, semi-synthetic, and synthetic textile fibers enter the environment and affect organisms and ecosystems, highlighting that fiber type influences toxicity and persistence. The authors conclude that textile fibers are an underappreciated category of microplastic pollution with diverse ecological effects.
Fragmented fibre (including microplastic) pollution from textiles
This review examined fragmented fiber pollution from all textile types including natural, regenerated, and synthetic fabrics, finding that all textiles release fibers throughout their lifecycle from manufacturing to washing to disposal, and that natural fiber shedding has been underestimated relative to synthetic fibers in pollution assessments.
Are We Underestimating Anthropogenic Microfiber Pollution? A Critical Review of Occurrence, Methods, and Reporting
This critical review examines whether anthropogenic microfiber pollution is being underestimated due to inconsistent research methods and reporting practices. Researchers found that natural and semisynthetic fibers like cotton and wool, which are often excluded from microplastic counts, contain chemical additives that make them persistent environmental contaminants. The study argues that all anthropogenic microfibers, not just synthetic ones, should be included in pollution assessments for a more accurate picture of contamination levels.
Impacts of non-petroleum and petroleum-based microfibers on aquatic organisms: a meta-analysis
This meta-analysis compared the toxic effects of petroleum-based and non-petroleum microfibers on aquatic organisms. Surprisingly, natural fibers like cotton and viscose also caused significant biological harm, not just synthetic ones like polyester and nylon. This means that even "natural" textiles shed fibers that can damage aquatic ecosystems, complicating the assumption that non-synthetic clothing is automatically safer for the environment.
Microfibre and nanofibre: pollution and environmental impacts
This review examines microfibres and nanofibres — shed from clothing and textiles during use and washing — as a significant but poorly quantified category of environmental pollutants. Up to 4.28 million metric tonnes of microfibres enter the environment each year, with synthetic garment laundering responsible for about 35% of that total, yet natural fibre shedding is largely ignored in sustainability assessments. The authors argue that both synthetic and natural microfibres need to be included in environmental impact frameworks, especially as fast fashion drives ever-increasing textile production.