0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Remediation Sign in to save

Microplastics Removal Strategies in Aquatic Environments

Jurnal Presipitasi Media Komunikasi dan Pengembangan Teknik Lingkungan 2025 Score: 38 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Edhi Widiyanto, Titik Istirokhatun, Pertiwi Andarani, Heru Susanto, Ria Desiriani, Pamella Apriliana

Summary

This review examines and compares multiple strategies for removing microplastics from aquatic environments, including physical, physicochemical, and biological methods. Researchers found that each approach offers different trade-offs in removal efficiency and scalability, emphasizing the need for integrated treatment solutions given the global abundance of microplastics and their negative effects on aquatic ecosystems.

Microplastics (MPs) have been globally detected in aquatic environments. The abundance of MPs contributed to the negative effects on aquatic ecosystems. Thus, it’s critical to create effective solutions for removing MPs from water. In this review, we compared several methods, including physical, physicochemical, and biological approaches, towards membrane filtration. The physical filtration technology is the simplest way in comparison with other methods. However, the removal ability of physical filtration against smaller MPs than 20 𝜇m becomes a crucial concern. Then, the other option is an adsorption method. Although the adsorption option is an inexpensive method, the undesirable aspect during adsorbent usage may not be environmentally friendly in aquatic systems. The similar problem is also demonstrated by chemical approaches in terms of coagulation and electrocoagulation treatment. Consequently, the biological methods were found to be less toxic to the environment. Even though it provides safe conditions to the environment, the biological approach needs a long time to degrade MPs. To overcome their disadvantages, the membrane technology offers efficient removal of MPs and no addition of chemical usage. However, the main point to pay attention to is that each technology has benefits and drawbacks. Therefore, the application of multiple technologies for MPs removal is considered.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Removal of Microplastic Contaminants from Aquatic Environment

This review examines technologies for removing microplastics from aquatic environments, covering physical, chemical, and biological treatment methods and their relative effectiveness. Identifying and improving removal strategies is urgent because microplastics are now found throughout drinking water sources, oceans, and freshwater systems, posing risks to wildlife and human health.

Article Tier 2

Critical review of microplastics removal from the environment

This review evaluates technologies for removing microplastics from the environment, including physical methods like filtration, chemical treatments, and biological approaches using microorganisms. Each method has trade-offs between effectiveness, cost, and scalability, and no single technology can solve the problem alone. The authors emphasize that reducing human exposure to microplastics requires combining better removal technologies with policies that limit plastic production and waste at the source.

Article Tier 2

Chemical, physical, and biological techniques to remove microplastics

This review covers the chemical, physical, and biological techniques available for removing microplastics from the environment, comparing their effectiveness and practical limitations. Researchers found that while each approach has strengths, no single method is sufficient for complete removal across different environmental settings. The study suggests that combining multiple techniques offers the most promising path toward effective microplastic remediation.

Article Tier 2

Current status of microplastics and nanoplastics removal methods: Summary, comparison and prospect

This review comprehensively summarized and compared current methods for removing micro- and nanoplastics from water, covering physical, chemical, and biological approaches while identifying key challenges and future directions for improving removal efficiency.

Article Tier 2

Review and future outlook for the removal of microplastics by physical, biological and chemical methods in water bodies and wastewaters

This review compares physical, biological, and chemical methods for removing microplastics from water and wastewater, including newer approaches like advanced membranes, bacterial degradation, and electrochemical treatment. Each method has trade-offs between removal efficiency, cost, and environmental impact, and no single technique currently solves the problem completely. The review emphasizes that developing effective microplastic removal technology is urgent for protecting both ecosystems and human drinking water supplies.

Share this paper