0
Article Tier 2 Sign in to save

Does Microplastics from Biopolymer-Coated Fertilizer Restrict Potato Growth? Insights into the Role of Microbial Community and Function Genes

AI summary Read the abstract

A study tested microplastics from biodegradable fertilizer coatings in soil growing potatoes. Even at the highest amount tested, equal to 100 years of buildup, potato yield was not significantly affected, though the microplastics did change soil bacteria types and genes involved in carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycling.

Body Systems

Biopolymer-coated fertilizers (BCFs) are considered an ideal alternative to conventional fertilizers. However, limited information is currently available concerning the influence of microplastics (MPs) from BCF residual coatings (BCF-MPs) on soil-plant interactions, particularly concerning the microbial community and functional genes. Here, the response of the bacterial community, soil functional genes related to the C, N, and P, as well as potato growth, to BCF-MPs were investigated. The results indicated that BCF-MPs did not significantly decrease potato yield, even at the highest application rate, which is equivalent to a 100-year residual dose. Additionally, BCF-MPs increased the relative abundance of Gemmatimonadota and Chloroflexi while decreasing the relative abundance of Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes. BCF-MPs decreased genes involved in soil C (Calvin cycle), N (denitrification and nitrification), and P cycles (inorganic P solubilization), while enhancing genes associated with soil C (Arnon-Buchanan cycle, and Wood-Ljungdahl pathway), N (N fixation), and P cycles (phosphonate mineralization). Structural equation modeling (SEM) and Mantel test analyses revealed that the functional genes involved in soil C (glpX), N (nasA, napB, narG, and narH), and P (phnC and phnD) cycles significantly impacted potato yield. Although BCF-MPs induced differential alterations in the bacterial community and functional genes involved in C, N, and P cycling, potato yield was not significantly altered. Overall, our results have great implications for assessing the environmental safety of BCF in agricultural.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

The Structural and Functional Responses of Rhizosphere Bacteria to Biodegradable Microplastics in the Presence of Biofertilizers

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers studied how biodegradable microplastics interact with biofertilizers in crop soils and found that even though biodegradable plastics are designed as greener alternatives, they still significantly altered soil bacterial communities and disrupted carbon metabolism pathways. The findings suggest that biodegradable microplastics may affect soil health differently than conventional plastics, but are not necessarily harmless.

Article Tier 2

Soil microorganisms play an important role in the detrimental impact of biodegradable microplastics on plants

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers found that biodegradable microplastics harmed vegetable crop growth by disrupting the soil microbial community rather than through direct contact with the plants. When soil microorganisms were suppressed, the negative effects of the biodegradable microplastics on plant growth were also reduced. The study suggests that soil bacteria and fungi play a key role in mediating the harmful impacts of biodegradable plastics on agricultural crops.

Article Tier 2

Polyethylene microplastic and soil nitrogen dynamics: Unraveling the links between functional genes, microbial communities, and transformation processes

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers conducted a six-month experiment to understand how polyethylene microplastics in soil affect nitrogen cycling, a process critical for soil fertility and plant nutrition. They found that while total nitrogen levels stayed stable, microplastics significantly altered the forms of nitrogen present by increasing ammonium and nitrate while decreasing dissolved organic nitrogen. The study suggests that microplastics reshape soil microbial communities and their nitrogen-processing activities, potentially disrupting the natural nutrient balance in agricultural soils.

Article Tier 2

Effects of microplastics and carbon nanotubes on soil geochemical properties and bacterial communities

AI summary Read the abstract

In a 100-day soil experiment, researchers found that both conventional polyethylene and biodegradable polylactic acid microplastics significantly altered soil chemistry, nutrient levels, and bacterial communities. At higher concentrations, microplastics reduced nitrogen and phosphorus availability and changed the types of bacteria present, which could affect soil fertility. These findings matter because healthy soil bacteria are essential for growing the food we eat, and widespread microplastic contamination could quietly undermine agricultural productivity.

Article Tier 2

LDPE microplastics affect soil microbial communities and nitrogen cycling

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers found that adding polyethylene microplastics to soil changed the bacterial communities and disrupted the nitrogen cycle, which is essential for soil fertility and plant growth. Microplastics increased the activity of certain nitrogen-processing genes while decreasing others, shifting the balance of nutrient cycling. These changes in soil function could ultimately affect crop health and the quality of food grown in microplastic-contaminated agricultural land.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper