0
Article Tier 2 Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Fish species, habitat, and capture location outweigh fish mass as drivers of microplastic pollution in Canadian Arctic fishes

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers investigated microplastic contamination in 435 stomachs and gastrointestinal tracts of seven freshwater fish species from the Canadian Arctic. The study found that fish species, habitat type, and capture location were more important drivers of microplastic levels than fish size, with demersal species and those near larger human populations containing significantly more microplastics.

Body Systems
Study Type Environmental

Fishes are key indicators of ecosystem health and are important food sources for Indigenous peoples. Although fishes have been shown to ingest microplastics (MPs; plastic particles <5 mm long) in localities between the polar regions and equator, very few investigations focus on the drivers of microplastic pollution in Arctic fishes. We investigated MPs in 435 stomachs and gastrointestinal (GI) tracts of 7 freshwater fish species from the Canadian Arctic and tested for correlations with habitat, capture location, surrounding human population, and stomach/GI tract mass. Overall, an average 2.22 ± 3.51 MPs per fish was determined following blank and polymer composition normalizations. Northern pike (Esox lucius) contained the greatest average microplastic abundance (3.59 ± 5.09 MPs/fish), the highest percentage of individuals containing MPs (86%), and as a demersal species, contained significantly more MPs than pelagic and benthic fishes. Fishes captured from the Great Slave Lake location contained significantly more total MPs (mean 3.41 ± 4.40 MPs/fish) than fishes from four other studied locations, which may be explained by the greater human population around Great Slave Lake. Fish captured from lakes on the more remote and sparsely populated Cornwallis Island, however, contained significantly greater micro-fragment concentrations, which suggests that proximity to localized anthropogenic activities can influence microplastic concentrations. We found no relationship between stomach/GI tract mass and microplastic abundance. Our study provides a crucial baseline for long-term monitoring of MPs in Arctic fishes, as it assesses the main factors contributing to microplastic ingestion in over 400 freshwater fish and in multiple fish species at 18 capture sites.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Effect of biological and environmental factors on microplastic ingestion of commercial fish species

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers analyzed microplastic ingestion in commercially important fish species, evaluating how biological and environmental factors influence ingestion rates across 2,222 individual fish. The study assessed gastrointestinal tract contents to determine the extent and patterns of microplastic contamination. The findings suggest that both species-specific biology and environmental conditions play important roles in determining microplastic ingestion levels in commercial fish.

Meta Analysis Tier 1

Comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of microplastic prevalence and abundance in freshwater fish species: the effect of fish species habitat, feeding behavior, and Fulton’s condition factor

AI summary Read the abstract

A meta-analysis of freshwater fish across 42 studies found an average of 2.35 microplastic items per individual, with 80% of research focused on the gastrointestinal tract and 58% on river environments. Contrary to expectations, microplastic ingestion correlated with fish body physiology (size and weight) rather than feeding behavior or habitat, suggesting physical characteristics determine uptake more than ecological niche.

Article Tier 2

Microplastic Retention by Type in Several Species of Fish from the Great Lakes

AI summary Read the abstract

This study examined microplastic retention by particle type in several species of fish from the Great Lakes, analyzing digestive tracts for plastic content across different fish feeding strategies. Fish from the Great Lakes are consumed by humans, making microplastic contamination in these species directly relevant to public health concerns.

Systematic Review Tier 1

Geographical and ecological factors affect microplastic body burden in marine fish at global scale

AI summary Read the abstract

This systematic review analyzed microplastic levels found in marine fish worldwide and identified key factors driving contamination. Fish from areas with heavy human activity contained more microplastics, and since many of these species are eaten by people, this contamination represents a direct route of human exposure through seafood.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics in the Arctic: A case study with sub-surface water and fish samples off Northeast Greenland

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers investigated microplastic contamination in sub-surface water and two mid-trophic level fish species off Northeast Greenland, finding synthetic particles in both water samples and fish stomachs. The study demonstrates that even remote Arctic ecosystems are not free from microplastic pollution, with fibers being the most commonly detected particle type.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper