We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Reforming Plastic Waste Governance in Sri Lanka: A Critical Legal Analysis through Comparative Environmental Law and the Right to Life
AI summary Read the abstract
This paper examines weaknesses in Sri Lanka's laws on plastic waste, comparing them with approaches used in India and the European Union. It argues that poor enforcement harms the environment, health and the right to life, and recommends new legal reforms, including a unified plastic waste law.
Abstract— Plastic pollution has emerged as one of the most pressing environmental and public health challenges in Sri Lanka, threatening ecosystems, biodiversity, public health, and sustainable development. Despite the existence of several regulatory measures under the National Environmental Act No. 47 of 1980 and related Gazette Notifications restricting single-use plastics, Sri Lanka’s plastic waste governance framework remains fragmented, weakly enforced, and institutionally inconsistent. This study critically examines the inadequacies of the existing legal and policy framework governing plastic waste in Sri Lanka through a comparative environmental law approach, with particular emphasis on the protection of the right to life. The study argues that ineffective plastic waste governance not only contributes to environmental degradation but also undermines fundamental human rights by exposing communities to hazardous waste, polluted waterways, flooding, marine contamination, and health-related risks associated with plastic disposal and microplastic exposure. Employing a qualitative doctrinal methodology supported by comparative analysis, the paper evaluates legal models adopted in India and the European Union, particularly Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), lifecycle regulation, and circular economy-based approaches to plastic governance. The paper further analyses the constitutional and human rights dimensions of environmental protection by examining the evolving recognition of environmental rights within comparative jurisprudence and international human rights law. It contends that Sri Lanka’s current regulatory regime lacks an integrated legal mechanism capable of ensuring accountability, sustainability, and effective enforcement. Accordingly, the study proposes comprehensive legal and institutional reforms, including the enactment of a unified Plastic Waste Management Act, incorporation of statutory EPR obligations, strengthening enforcement mechanisms, and adopting rights-based environmental governance strategies. The study ultimately concludes that meaningful reform of Sri Lanka’s plastic waste governance framework is essential not only for environmental sustainability but also for safeguarding the right to life and ensuring intergenerational environmental protection.
More Papers Like This
Legal Framework of Plastic Packaging and Labelling in Sri Lanka: A Comparative Analysis
AI summary Read the abstract
This Sri Lankan study used secondary data and expert review to examine plastic packaging waste regulations, finding that the country's primary reliance on landfilling exacerbates plastic pollution due to poor waste separation, threatening tourism, fisheries, and agriculture. The authors recommend mandatory consumer-facing recyclability labeling and eco-labelling regulations to promote improved waste separation, recycling, and a shift toward circular economy practices for plastic packaging.
Plastic Waste Management in Indonesia: Current Legal Approaches and Future Perspectives
AI summary Read the abstract
A normative analysis of Indonesian plastic waste governance found that existing laws and regulations contain significant weaknesses, including inadequate enforcement mechanisms and unclear stakeholder roles, calling for strengthened legal approaches to address the country's major plastic pollution problem.
Life Cycle Assessment of Selected Single-Use Plastic Products towards Evidence-Based Policy Recommendations in Sri Lanka
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers applied life cycle assessment to common single-use plastic products in Sri Lanka, quantifying their environmental impacts across production to disposal and providing evidence-based recommendations to guide national plastic pollution policy.
Towards Plastic Circularity: Current Practices in Plastic Waste Management in Japan and Sri Lanka
AI summary Read the abstract
A comparison of plastic waste management in Japan and Sri Lanka found that Japan practices the full plastic value chain while Sri Lanka relies heavily on an informal recycling sector, and recommends Japan's Extended Producer Responsibility approach as a model for Sri Lanka to improve plastic circularity.
Environmental legislation analysis improvement approach of global marine plastic pollution from the perspective of holistic system view
AI summary Read the abstract
This review analyzes international laws and regulations aimed at preventing marine plastic pollution, from United Nations conventions to individual country legislation. The authors find that current legal frameworks are fragmented and fail to address the full scope of the problem, including microplastics entering human bloodstreams through the food chain. They propose a comprehensive Marine Plastics Convention that emphasizes environmental justice and stricter risk prevention measures.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.