0
Article Tier 2 Sign in to save

Engineering properties of eucalyptus ash cement gravel columns reinforced with fibres from plastic bottles

Original title: ณสมบตทางวศวกรรมของเสากรวดซเมนตเถายคาลปตสเสรมแรงดวยเสนใยจากขวดพลาสตก

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers tested lab-made columns built from gravel, cement, eucalyptus ash, and fibers made from recycled plastic bottles, intended for strengthening soft ground under embankments. Replacing 10% of cement with eucalyptus ash and adding 1.0% plastic fiber produced the strongest, least porous columns with the lowest water permeability, compared to other tested amounts.

Construction of embankments on soft clay foundations often encounters excessive settlement and low stability due to the low shear strength and high compressibility of the soil. Ground improvement techniques using columns such as concrete columns, soil–cement columns, and gravel columns are commonly adopted to enhance subsoil performance. However, these columns generally provide strength higher than required for embankment applications, resulting in increased construction costs and resource consumption. This study proposes the development of a semi-rigid column by integrating the characteristics of flexible and rigid columns, namely a eucalyptus ash–cemented gravel column reinforced with plastic bottle fibers. The objective is to investigate its engineering properties for construction applications while simultaneously reducing material costs and environmental impacts. Ordinary Portland cement was partially replaced with eucalyptus ash, a by-product from biomass power plants with suitable chemical composition for pozzolanic reactions, to enhance bonding performance and reduce cement consumption. In addition, recycled plastic bottles were processed into fibers to reinforce the column material, aiming to improve crack resistance and mechanical performance while mitigating plastic waste. The materials consisted of coarse aggregates with sizes of 4.76–9.51 mm and 9.51–19.00 mm, hydraulic cement content of 340 kg/m³, and a water–cement ratio of 0.32. Cement was replaced with eucalyptus ash at 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25% by weight. Recycled plastic fibers with a width of 2 mm and length of 70 mm were incorporated at 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0% by volume. Tests were conducted to determine porosity, compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, and coefficient of permeability at curing ages of 28 and 90 days. The results showed that aggregate size, eucalyptus ash content, and plastic fiber content all affected the strength and drainage capacity of the columns. Well-graded aggregate provided the highest strength due to better particle arrangement, while single-sized aggregate provided better porosity and water permeability. Replacing cement with 10% eucalyptus ash resulted in the highest strength, along with the lowest porosity and coefficient of permeability. Similarly, a plastic fiber content of 1.0% resulted in the highest strength, along with the lowest porosity and coefficient of permeability. These findings can serve as a guideline for designing the mix proportions of eucalyptus ash–cemented gravel column reinforced with plastic bottle fibers to suit specific application objectives—whether emphasizing strength or drainage performance—thereby promoting efficient resource utilization and reducing environmental impact.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Environmental and Cost Advantages of Using Polyethylene Terephthalate Fibre Reinforced Concrete with Fly Ash as a Partial Cement Replacement

AI summary Read the abstract

This study examined the environmental and cost benefits of using recycled PET plastic bottles as fiber reinforcement in concrete, combined with fly ash as a partial cement replacement. Repurposing plastic waste in construction materials could help reduce the volume of plastic entering the environment as microplastics.

Article Tier 2

Performance evaluation of PET-modified concrete with PET granules and manufactured sand as fine aggregates

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers found that mixing shredded plastic bottles into concrete, replacing some sand, actually made it stronger when used at the right amount (2%). This matters because it gives plastic waste a useful second life instead of it sitting in landfills or being burned, which releases toxic fumes harmful to human health.

Article Tier 2

The Utilizing of Recycled Plastic Waste as an Alternative for Zero Cement Paving Blocks

AI summary Read the abstract

This study tested the compressive strength and water absorption of paving blocks made entirely from recycled plastic waste without cement. Using plastic waste in construction materials offers a way to permanently remove plastic from the environment while meeting the growing need for durable urban infrastructure.

Article Tier 2

Utilization of Recycled Plastic Waste as Partial Substitute of Fine Aggregate in Eco-Friendly Concrete

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers tested recycled plastic waste as a replacement for fine aggregate (sand) in concrete, mixing it in at 0%, 10%, 20%, and 30%. Concrete with 10% plastic waste had the highest compressive strength, while plain concrete (0%) had the lowest, and strength declined slightly at 20% and 30%.

Article Tier 2

Comparison of Concrete Properties Utilizing Expanded Polysterene beads and Shredded PET Bottle Particles as Fine Aggregate Replacement

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers tested concrete made with recycled plastic (expanded polystyrene beads and shredded PET bottle particles) replacing some sand. As more plastic was added, the concrete got weaker and lighter, but resisted water absorption better. Only one mix, with 5% burnt PET, met the strength standard for structural lightweight concrete.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper