We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Pollution and the Genome: Genotoxic and Epigenetic Effects — Review
AI summary Read the abstract
This review summarizes existing research on how pollutants, including particulate matter, metals, PAHs, pesticides, and plasticizers like BPA and phthalates, can damage DNA or change how genes are read without altering DNA sequence. Evidence from human studies, cells, and animals was strongest for particulate matter, and exposure before birth to lead, BPA, or phthalates was linked to gene-reading changes lasting into childhood in humans and adulthood in mice.
Environmental pollutants alter the genome via two chemically distinct routes (Hou et al., 2011). The first route involves covalent or oxidative modification of DNA, in which metabolically activated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) form bulky adducts, and transition metals and fine particulate matter (PM₂.₅) generate reactive oxygen species that produce 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-oxodG) and induce strand breaks. When these lesions coincide with impaired repair, they can lead to mutations, micronuclei, and chromosomal aberrations. The second route leaves the base sequence intact but alters how genes are read through DNA methylation, histone modification, and noncoding RNAs. This mini-review compares the evidence for both routes across five pollutant classes: ambient particulate matter, metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), pesticides, and plasticizers (bisphenol A (BPA) and phthalates). The evidence is strongest for particulate matter, where human biomonitoring and cell and animal studies agree on oxidative DNA damage and methylation change. Prenatal exposure emerges as the most sensitive window, as methylation changes after prenatal lead, BPA, or phthalate exposure persist into childhood or adolescence in human cohorts and adulthood in mice (Goodrich et al., 2016; Khodasevich et al., 2024). The evidence is weaker for direct mutation endpoints in humans, pollutant-specific attribution within real mixtures, and transgenerational inheritance. We argue that single-assay studies cannot resolve these questions and propose a minimum biomarker panel that pairs a lesion marker, repair or instability marker, and epigenetic readout in the same subjects.
More Papers Like This
Environmental Xenobiotics and Epigenetic Modifications: Implications for Human Health and Disease
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines how environmental pollutants, including microplastics, can change gene activity through epigenetic modifications without altering DNA itself. These changes to how genes are turned on and off can contribute to cancer, brain diseases, and developmental problems, and may even be passed down to future generations. The research highlights that microplastics and other common pollutants could have long-lasting health effects that go beyond direct chemical toxicity.
Immune–Epigenetic Effects of Environmental Pollutants: Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Transgenerational Impact
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines how environmental pollutants, including microplastics, heavy metals, and endocrine-disrupting chemicals, can alter immune function through epigenetic changes that modify gene expression without changing DNA itself. Researchers identified common molecular pathways through which these pollutants trigger inflammation and immune disruption. The study also highlights evidence that some of these epigenetic changes may be passed to future generations.
Beyond genetics: can micro and nanoplastics induce epigenetic and gene-expression modifications?
AI summary Read the abstract
This review gathers existing research on whether micro and nanoplastics can cause epigenetic changes, which are modifications that alter how genes work without changing the DNA itself. Although studies are still limited, the evidence so far shows that both short-term and long-term plastic particle exposure can trigger these gene-level changes in various organisms. This is concerning because epigenetic changes can potentially be passed to future generations and may contribute to disease.
Prenatal Environmental Determinants of Aromatase Brain-Promoter Methylation in Cord Blood: Chemical, Airborne, Pharmacological, and Nutritional Factors
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers found that a mix of everyday exposures during pregnancy, including BPA (a chemical in plastics), phthalates, air pollution, household mould, low sunlight, and low folate intake, was linked to changes in a gene that helps balance hormones in a developing baby's brain. This matters because that gene has previously been tied to autism risk, suggesting these common exposures might work together to affect brain development in ways science is only beginning to understand. It's an early finding, not proof of cause and effect, but it adds to growing concerns about how plastic-related chemicals and pollution during pregnancy could influence a baby's long-term
Early-Life Environmental Pollutants and Neurodevelopmental Risks: Unraveling Exposure Pathways, Mechanisms, and Preventive Strategies
AI summary Read the abstract
This review synthesizes evidence from 112 studies on how early-life exposure to pollutants such as lead, fine particulate matter, and phthalates disrupts neurodevelopment in children by impairing the blood-brain barrier, altering dopamine and thyroid signaling, and inducing epigenetic changes linked to ASD and ADHD, while calling for multi-omics longitudinal research and stronger regulatory action.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.