We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Nanoplastics-mediated interfacial processes controlling perfluorooctanoic acid transport in forward osmosis
Summary
Researchers examined how polystyrene nanoplastics with different surface chemistries affect PFAS removal in a forward osmosis membrane system, finding that nanoplastic fouling promotes accumulation of PFOA near the membrane surface — especially for positively charged particles — worsening concentration polarization and complicating PFAS removal from contaminated waters.
Forward osmosis (FO) has gained attention as a low-pressure treatment option for removing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). PFAS frequently coexist with micro and nanoplastics (NPs) in contaminated waters, yet their combined influence on membrane separation remains insufficiently understood. In this study, a UiO-66-NH modified antifouling FO membrane was fabricated to investigate how NPs affect the rejection and transport of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). PFOA removal was evaluated under different membrane orientation, pH of the feed solution, draw solution salinity, coexisting PFAS species, and the presence of polystyrene-based NPs with different surface chemistries (PS, PS-NH, PS-COOH). The membrane showed high PFOA rejection efficiency, which increased under alkaline conditions but declined at high draw-solution concentration due to reverse salt diffusion and charge screening. Coexisting PFAS with different chain lengths and pKa values altered PFOA rejection through competitive interactions at the membrane interface. Experimental evidence further showed that NP-related fouling strengthened external concentration polarization and promoted extra accumulation of PFOA near the membrane, with the extent of accumulation strongly dependent on NP surface chemistry, particularly electrostatic attraction for PS-NH and weaker interactions for PS and PS-COOH. These results demonstrate that NPs play an important role in PFAS transport during FO filtration and should be considered when evaluating mass-transfer behavior in complex waters. This work provides insights into the dual impact of coexisting PFAS and NPs on FO membrane performance and highlights the importance of mitigating cake-enhanced polarization in designing antifouling membranes for wastewater treatment.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
The partition behavior of perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanesulfonamide (FOSA) on microplastics
This study examined the sorption of PFOS and FOSA — two persistent fluorinated chemicals — onto polyethylene, polystyrene, and PVC microplastics and found that sorption capacity varied by polymer type and was influenced by pH, salinity, and organic matter. The results suggest microplastics could act as transport vectors for these persistent pollutants in marine environments.
Impact of nanoplastics on membrane scaling and fouling in reverse osmosis desalination process
This study investigated how polystyrene nanoplastics affect membrane scaling and fouling in reverse osmosis desalination, finding that nanoplastics interacted with silica to alter fouling behavior and reduce membrane performance. The results highlight nanoplastics as a potentially disruptive contaminant for desalination infrastructure.
Mechanistic Insights into PFAS Adsorption on Microplastics: Effects of Contaminant Properties and Water Chemistry
Researchers investigated how two widely detected PFAS compounds, PFOS and PFOA, adsorb onto five common types of microplastics in aquatic environments. The study found that contaminant properties and water chemistry significantly influence adsorption behavior, confirming that microplastics can serve as carriers for PFAS transport in waterways.
Fouling behavior heterogeneity of typical nanoplastics in widely used polyvinylidene fluoride ultrafiltration membranes
Polystyrene nanoplastics caused more severe membrane fouling and greater cleaning difficulty in polyvinylidene fluoride ultrafiltration membranes than polyethylene nanoplastics, with flux descent rates ranging from 9–36%, raising concerns about nanoplastics passing through or fouling water treatment membranes.
Recent advances on micro/nanoplastic pollution and membrane fouling during water treatment: A review
Researchers reviewed recent advances in understanding how micro- and nanoplastics contribute to membrane fouling during water treatment processes. The study found that while membrane separation effectively removes microplastics from wastewater effluent, fouling caused by plastic particles along with dissolved organics and extracellular polymers remains a key obstacle, and understanding the fouling mechanisms is critical for improving treatment efficiency.