0
Commentary ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 3 ? Commentary, letter, editorial, or conference abstract. Useful context, not primary evidence. Sign in to save

Sixty-six years of the Inhaled Particles symposia—a commentary

Annals of Work Exposures and Health 2026
John W. Cherrie

Summary

For over 60 years, scientists have studied how tiny inhaled particles, from coal dust and asbestos to today's nanoplastics, affect our lungs and health, and this article reviews what we've learned from a long-running research conference on the topic. The key takeaway: while we've made major progress understanding how particles get into our lungs and cause harm, researchers now need to work together more closely (combining data on exposure, health outcomes, and toxicity) to better predict health risks from newer concerns like nanoplastics and air pollution. This matters because better science here could lead to stronger protections against everyday particle exposures that affect our respiratory

Models

The first Inhaled Particles Symposium was held in 1960 under the leadership of 2 aerosol scientists, Norman Davies and Henry Walton. The study of inhaled particles has evolved over the subsequent decades, encompassing toxicology, epidemiology, aerosol science and occupational hygiene to understand their potential health impacts. Research has progressed from studies of workers in coal mines and those working with asbestos along with other dusts, including talc, radioactive particles, irritant aerosols such as enzymes and other organic dusts, and latterly nanoparticles and nanoplastics. The papers have mostly concerned occupational exposure, although some symposia included sessions on air pollution and cigarette smoke. This commentary briefly summarises some of the key achievements of 14 Inhaled Particles symposia, highlighting advances in particle deposition, clearance, exposure measurement and toxicity assessment. These symposia have fostered multidisciplinary dialogue, although recent meetings have become primarily focused on particle toxicology. It is argued that there is a need to reinvigorate the dialogue between epidemiologists, exposure scientists and toxicologists to develop comprehensive models linking exposure metrics to disease risk. Such integration would enhance risk assessment and inform preventive strategies for diverse inhaled particles. Additionally, preserving the symposia's legacy through an accessible archive would support ongoing research and collaboration in this important scientific field.

Share this paper