0
Article Tier 2 Sign in to save

Effects of accumulation of acrylic microfibers on algal ingestion, growth, and survival of spat of slipper-cupped oyster Magallana billeneata (Röding 1798)

AI summary Read the abstract

Baby oysters exposed to high levels of tiny plastic fibers (the kind that shed from synthetic clothing) ate less food and grew more slowly, and this stunted growth didn't fully bounce back even after weeks passed. Since oysters are a popular seafood and plastic pollution in oceans keeps rising, this research suggests that if microplastic contamination continues growing, it could hurt oyster health and, in turn, the seafood supply that depends on them.

Microplastics (MPs) are a growing concern globally but ecotoxicological studies assessing the effects of the most abundant MP morphotype, microfibers, remain limited. Here, we investigated the concentration-dependent effects of acrylic microfibers (AMFs) on spats of commercially important slipper cupped oyster (Magallana bilineata). Oyster spats (55-d post fertilization, 1-5 mm) were sub-chronically (30-d) exposed to 0, 1, 10, 100 AMF mL as treatments and sub-samples were periodically collected to determine AMF ingestion and changes in spat survival, growth rate, and algal ingestion rate. As early as week one, spats were observed to be covered with AMFs, and pseudofeces-AMF aggregates indicated possible ingestion and egestion of AMFs by spats. Further, lower algal ingestion rates by the oyster spats were observed after exposure to high AMF concentration (100 AMF ml) and was accompanied by slowed growth rates across all treatments after two weeks of exposure. Although no mortality occurred and some recovery was observed during the 3rd to 4th weeks, the growth rates of spats exposed to 100 MP mL remained significantly lower than that of spats in the other treatments and controls across time points, suggesting irreversible effects on oyster fitness after exposure to high AMF concentrations. These observed responses of oyster spats to AMFs could potentially indicate ecotoxicological effects of MPs. While lasting effects were restricted to the highest exposure concentration, continued increases in environmental microplastic contamination could potentially result in exposure levels capable of eliciting comparable biological responses in the future, ultimately, affecting oysters in both the wild and aquaculture setting.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Do Environmentally Relevant Concentrations of Microplastics Pose a Threat to the Eastern Oyster, Crassostrea Virginica?

AI summary Read the abstract

This study exposed eastern oysters to polyester microfibers at environmentally realistic concentrations for 45 days, finding that even low doses affected their physiology including feeding, growth, and energy use. The results suggest that ecologically relevant microplastic levels may pose a threat to commercially important filter-feeding shellfish.

Article Tier 2

Impact of polyester and cotton microfibers on growth and sublethal biomarkers in juvenile mussels

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed juvenile mussels to polyester and cotton microfibers at realistic ocean concentrations for 94 days and found that polyester microfibers reduced mussel growth rates by up to 36%, suggesting that microplastic fiber pollution could harm marine ecosystems and threaten shellfish aquaculture.

Article Tier 2

Evidence of deleterious effects of microplastics from aquaculture materials on pediveliger larva settlement and oyster spat growth of Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) larvae and spat to microplastics derived from weathered aquaculture materials and found that both settlement rates and spat growth were significantly reduced, raising concerns about plastic pollution in aquaculture operations.

Article Tier 2

Oyster Microplastic Concentrations

AI summary Read the abstract

Scientists found that oysters soak up tiny plastic bits—including fragments, fibers, and tire dust—from warmer water faster than from cooler water, meaning rising ocean temperatures could make oysters accumulate more plastic pollution. Even after being moved to clean water, the oysters didn't fully flush out these particles within the study period, suggesting that if you eat oysters, you may be getting a dose of microplastics that lingers, especially from oysters grown in warmer waters.

Article Tier 2

Oyster Microplastic Concentrations

AI summary Read the abstract

Scientists fed oysters a mix of tiny plastic bits, plastic fibers, and tire dust at different water temperatures to see how much they'd absorb—and whether they could flush it out once moved to clean water. The findings matter because oysters are eaten whole, meaning any microplastics they soak up from warming, polluted waters could end up on your dinner plate, and warmer ocean temperatures (tied to climate change) may make this worse.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper