0
Article Tier 2 Sign in to save

Evaluation of filter substrates for concurrent optical photothermal infrared and Raman spectroscopy in microplastic analysis

AI summary Read the abstract

Scientists testing tiny plastic particles need reliable tools, and this study found that the material used to hold samples (the "filter") can make a big difference in how accurately advanced scanning techniques detect microplastics. By testing nine different filter types, researchers identified two (Anodisc and gold-coated PET) that gave the clearest, most consistent results, helping labs choose better tools to detect the tiny plastic particles increasingly found in our food, water, and even bodies. This matters because more accurate detection methods are the first step toward understanding how much microplastic exposure humans actually face and what health risks it might pose.

Abstract Optical photothermal infrared (O-PTIR) spectroscopy is an emerging technique to analyze submicron mid-infrared absorption. It can be combined with concurrent, co-located Raman spectroscopy on the same instrument platform, offering considerable potential for microplastic analysis. However, since measurements are typically performed directly on collection filters, substrate selection becomes a critical yet un-examined factor for these concurrent modalities. Here, we characterized nine commercially available filter substrates, namely Anodisc, silicon, gold-coated PET, gold-coated PC, silver, glass and quartz microfiber, PC, and cellulose, for O-PTIR and Raman analysis using 14 µm and 7 µm PMMA microplastic beads. Spectral fidelity was quantified via hit quality indices against a CaF 2 reference. Our results show that substrate suitability is governed by modality-specific requirements. O-PTIR demands mid-infrared spectral neutrality and is additionally sensitive to the substrate surface, whereas the quality of Raman spectra primarily depends on the absence of substrate Raman bands. Beyond spectral match quality, the reproducibility of PMMA spectra is consistently higher in the Raman channel than in the O-PTIR channel. This difference is attributed to O-PTIR’s sensitivity to local thermal contact and surface morphology, which introduce measurement variability absent in direct Raman scattering. Of the tested substrates, Anodisc and gold-coated PET performed the best in both modalities and with both particle sizes. These findings demonstrate that recommendations for substrates established for conventional FTIR or Raman microscopy cannot be transferred directly to O-PTIR. They also provide an evidence-based framework for selecting substrates in multimodal microplastic analysis workflows.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Characterizing the Influence of Filter Substrates on Raman Measurements of Microplastics

AI summary Read the abstract

Scientists trying to detect microplastics in water, food, or air often use a laser-based scanning technique, but the filter paper used to catch the tiny plastic bits can interfere with the results. This study found that with the right scanning technique, even cheaper, more common filters can give accurate readings — not just specialized "plastic-free" filters as previously assumed. This matters because it could make microplastic testing more affordable and accessible, helping researchers better track how much plastic pollution we're actually exposed to in our environment.

Article Tier 2

Development of an optimal filter substrate for the identification of small microplastic particles in food by micro-Raman spectroscopy

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers developed an optimal filter substrate for micro-Raman spectroscopy identification of microplastics in food samples, enabling reliable detection of particles down to 1 µm by improving the spectral quality obtained when analysing particles directly on the filter surface.

Article Tier 2

Comparative evaluation of filtration and imaging properties of analytical filters for microplastic capture and analysis

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared five analytical filter types for microplastic capture and analysis, evaluating their filtration efficiency and imaging properties to help standardize methods and improve the reliability of microplastic quantification across laboratories.

Article Tier 2

Quantitative Reliability of μ-FTIR-Based Microplastic Analysis: Effects of Filtration, Rinsing, and Software Calibration

AI summary Read the abstract

Scientists are still figuring out the best lab techniques for accurately counting tiny microplastic particles in water, since small differences in how samples are filtered, rinsed, and analyzed can throw off the results. This study tested different methods and found that using certain filters, rinsing with a diluted alcohol solution, and using a specific pump-based filtering technique significantly improved accuracy (catching 88-91% of known plastic particles). This matters because if researchers across different labs can't measure microplastics consistently, it's harder to know how much plastic is really in our water and food—which is the first step to understanding any health risks.

Article Tier 2

Identification of microplastics by FTIR and Raman microscopy: a novel silicon filter substrate opens the important spectral range below 1300 cm−1 for FTIR transmission measurements

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers developed a new approach using silicon filters compatible with both FT-IR and Raman spectroscopy to identify microplastics in environmental samples. The silicon filter substrate allows transmission-mode IR imaging across the entire sample without manual pre-sorting, improving efficiency and reducing contamination risk.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper