We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Terrestrial Ecotoxicity of Plastics: Effect Factors for Life Cycle Impact Assessment.
Summary
Scientists analyzed hundreds of studies to figure out how harmful plastic buildup in soil is to plants and small creatures like worms, creating a new scoring system to measure this damage. They found that plastics, especially tiny nanoplastics, are much less toxic to soil life than to water-based ecosystems, meaning we can't just assume plastic pollution affects land and water the same way. This matters because it gives researchers better tools to accurately assess how our growing plastic waste problem impacts farmland and the food chain, since soil is becoming a major dumping ground for plastic debris.
Soils act as major plastic pollution sinks, with potential implications for terrestrial ecosystem services. In life cycle assessment (LCA), such impacts are quantified using characterization factors that describe the fate, exposure, and effects of emitted substances. In this study, we develop terrestrial ecotoxicity exposure-and-effect factors (XEFs) for plastics in soil for use in LCA. We compiled 680 effect concentrations (ECs) from published ecotoxicity studies involving plants and invertebrates and converted them to EC10eq values. Following the USEtox framework, species-specific average EC10eq values were used to construct log-normal fitted species sensitivity distribution curves, from which XEFs were derived. The resulting XEF for plastics in soil equals 0.128 [0.07; 0.30] PAF·m3·kg-1. Specific XEFs for nanoplastics ≤1 μm and plastics >1 μm were calculated at 0.921 [0.11; 13.10] and 0.126 [0.07; 0.29] PAF·m3·kg-1, respectively. Specific XEFs for natural and agricultural soil were estimated at 0.159 [0.08; 0.40] and 0.236 [0.09; 0.77] PAF·m3·kg-1, respectively. The derived XEFs are lower than aquatic and sediment XEFs by 4 and 2 orders of magnitude, respectively. Consequently, direct read-across between compartments is not justified. Overall, the proposed XEFs are compatible with the USEtox methodology and enable improved inclusion of plastic-related terrestrial ecotoxicity impacts in LCA.