0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

Microplastic Particle Recovery from Orthodontic Appliances: An In Vitro Pilot Study Using Laser-Directed Infrared Spectroscopy

Applied Sciences 2026
Dana Dobrowski, Sercan Akyalçın, James K. Hartsfield, Kari C. Nadeau, Mary M. Johnson, Ana Cheong, E.J. Ross, Andre Weissheimer

Summary

Scientists tested clear aligners and nighttime retainers in artificial saliva to see if they shed tiny plastic particles (microplastics) into your mouth. They found that clear aligners released far more particles than nighttime-only retainers, over 1,000 in one case, though this was a small lab test, not a study of real people wearing these devices. More research is needed to know what this means for your health, but it's a useful first step in understanding a possible everyday source of microplastic exposure.

Study Type In vitro

To quantify and characterize microplastic particles recovered from orthodontic appliances under simulated intraoral conditions using laser-directed infrared spectroscopy (LDIR), five maxillary orthodontic appliances were exposed to artificial saliva at 37 °C under calibrated agitation simulating nighttime (8 h) and full-time (20 h) wear over a 14-day period. A 1 mL aliquot retrieved from a 50 mL exposure volume was analyzed using LDIR to determine particle count, size, eccentricity, and polymer composition, with statistical analyses performed on an exploratory and polymer-stratified basis. Particle recovery ranged from 11–16 particles for nighttime appliances and increased substantially for aligners (SmartTrack: 341; Zendura: 1382). Multiple polymer types were identified, and no statistically significant differences in particle diameter or eccentricity were observed after multiplicity correction. These findings show that orthodontic appliances can generate recoverable microplastic particles under simulated conditions, establish a reproducible framework for automated microplastic characterization, and support future investigation into clinical exposure. Because the effective detection threshold of the LDIR workflow is approximately 20 µm, smaller microplastics and nanoplastics were not evaluated in this study.

Share this paper