We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Plastic pollution is habitat in urban rivers: a case study in the Lower Los Angeles River, CA, USA
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists studying the Los Angeles River found that plastic trash, like bags, bottles, and foam, has become so common it now outnumbers natural materials like wood as a place for small aquatic bugs to live, essentially turning pollution into "habitat." While these bugs didn't seem to mind living on plastic versus natural debris, this doesn't mean plastic is good for the river, it means our waterways have become so altered that wildlife is adapting to trash, which raises questions about what happens as that plastic breaks down into smaller pieces (microplastics) that can move up the food chain and eventually affect the water and fish we may consume
Urban rivers are altered by anthropogenic disturbances reshaping instream habitat structure. Plastic pollution is increasingly prevalent in these systems, yet its ecological role remains unclear; it may provide, smother, or alter habitat complexity. Here, we investigated how macroplastic (> 5 mm) functions as habitat for macroinvertebrates in the Lower Los Angeles River, USA. We quantified anthropogenic litter including macroplastic and streamwood, and sampled macroinvertebrates from five macroplastic (shopping bags, drink bottles, foam fragments, hard fragments, fabric) and three natural substrates (vegetation, streamwood, processed wood) across three reaches at a single timepoint. Macroplastic exceeded streamwood in abundance (macroplastic:0.04–1.41m2; streamwood:0.01–0.34m2) and cumulative surface area (macroplastic:0.91–31.76m2; streamwood:0.45–2.61m2), suggesting that macroplastic is the dominant habitat in this modified ecosystem. Macroinvertebrate density did not differ between macroplastics and natural substrates, and abundance increased with item surface area regardless of material type. Macroinvertebrate community composition was dominated by tolerant taxa such as Chironomidae and Oligochaeta, and diversity did not differ between substrate types but differed between floating or benthic substrates. These findings suggest that macroplastic may function as habitat structure comparable to natural materials in the Los Angeles River; however, consequences remain unclear. Management strategies that remove macroplastic should also consider the potential impacts of this habitat loss.
More Papers Like This
Microplastic is an Abundant and Distinct Microbial Habitat in an Urban River
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers demonstrated that microplastic surfaces in an urban river host a microbial community that is distinct from surrounding water and sediment communities, establishing microplastic as an abundant and ecologically distinct habitat for river microorganisms.
Microplastic in surface waters of urban rivers: concentration, sources, and associated bacterial assemblages
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers measured microplastic levels in the surface waters of the Chicago River and its urban tributaries, finding concentrations as high as 1.94 particles per cubic meter near wastewater outflows. They discovered that microplastic fibers and pellets were often colonized by bacterial communities distinct from those in the surrounding water. The study provides early evidence that urban rivers are significant conduits for microplastic pollution and that these particles may serve as rafts for microorganisms.
Plastic litter is a part of the carbon cycle in an urban river: Microplastic and macroplastic accumulate with organic matter in floating debris rafts
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers measured both microplastic and macroplastic concentrations within floating debris rafts and open water in an urban river, quantifying plastic as carbon mass alongside organic matter. They found that macroplastics were exclusively associated with debris rafts, while microplastics occurred at higher concentrations in rafts than in open water. The study suggests that plastic litter represents a meaningful but often overlooked component of the carbon cycle in urban waterways.
Distinctive patterns of bacterial community succession in the riverine micro-plastisphere in view of biofilm development and ecological niches
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists studied how bacterial communities develop on microplastics versus natural materials in river water and found that plastics support a distinct pattern of microbial colonization. The research identified specific bacteria capable of degrading microplastics and revealed that competition among microbes on plastic surfaces follows unexpected patterns compared to natural substrates.
Spatiotemporal Variation and Potential Drivers of Macroplastic Pollution Across Urban Riparian Corridors in Patagonia, Argentina
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers studying rivers in Patagonia found that plastic trash—mostly plastic bags and food wrappers—piles up most heavily near cities, especially in spring, and this buildup is directly linked to how paved-over and developed the surrounding area is. This matters because trash sitting along riverbanks doesn't just look bad and harm local wildlife—it slowly breaks down into microplastics that flow into waterways, potentially ending up in the water and food we consume downstream.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.