We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Early-life exposure to plastics is associated with health parameters and biomarkers in southern giant petrels
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists found that seabird chicks who accidentally ate small bits of plastic showed measurable changes in their blood chemistry, nutrition levels, and immune function, even though the plastic made up less than 0.1% of their body weight. While this study was done in birds, not people, it's an important reminder that even tiny amounts of ingested plastic may cause subtle body-wide effects, especially during early development, something researchers are increasingly investigating in humans too, given how common microplastics have become in our food and water.
The sub-lethal effects of plastics and their associated chemicals on wildlife are poorly understood, primarily due to the lack of reliable indicators. We used southern giant petrels (Macronectes giganteus, SGP), key scavengers and predators in southern seas, to assess whether early-life exposure to plastics was associated with health parameters. We examined relationships between plastic ingestion (≥ 1 mm) and biomarkers of enzymatic activities (AChE acetylcholinesterase, BChE butyrylcholinesterase and GST glutathione S-transferase) and conventional health parameters (haematological, biochemical and morphometric data) in SGP chicks from colonies in Chubut, Argentina. During 2022 and 2023, plastics were detected in 71.4% of chicks (1-14 items, mean mass = 0.2510 g, representing < 0.1% of chick body mass). In 30-day-old chicks, plastic ingestion was associated with nutritional parameters (cholesterol, total solids, packed cell volume, calcium, body mass and body condition index), metabolism (enzymes aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase, creatinine phosphokinase) and immune response (eosinophil percentage). Associations with biomarkers (AChE, BChE, and GST) were observed but lost significance when accounting for inter-annual variation. By fledging (∼90 days), most relationships weakened or disappeared, while GST activity and calcium levels emerged as the only variables associated with plastic ingestion. It is unclear whether these associations reflect compensatory physiological responses to oxidative challenge, contaminant exposure, or developmental/ontogenetic adjustments. Our results highlight the value of multi-indicator approaches for detecting subtle physiological variation associated with plastic ingestion. Importantly, the pervasive threat of plastic pollution warrants investigating whether early-life exposure influences post-fledging survival and fitness.
More Papers Like This
Sublethal consequences of plastic exposure in seabirds
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers studied the sublethal effects of macroplastic and microplastic ingestion in flesh-footed shearwaters (seabirds) and found evidence of reduced body condition, altered blood chemistry, and elevated chemical tissue concentrations. The findings suggest that plastic ingestion causes measurable harm to seabirds even below lethal doses, with implications for population health in plastic-polluted marine environments.
A novel blood biomarker for plastic ingestion in fledgling procellariiform seabirds.
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists developed a simple blood test that can detect plastic-related damage inside seabirds with 96% accuracy, by spotting patterns of cell damage and scarring linked to swallowing plastic. While this study focused on wild birds rather than people, it's an early step toward tools that could one day help researchers understand how plastic exposure harms living tissue over time — research that could eventually inform how we think about the health effects of microplastics in humans too.
Evaluating the Ecotoxicological Effects of Microplastics on Terrestrial Passerines: Insights from Eurasian Tree Sparrows
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists fed tiny plastic particles (microplastics) to sparrows for three weeks and found that while the birds' overall health, blood, and organs seemed fine, the mix of bacteria living in their guts did shift—especially when the plastic pieces were larger. This matters because it shows even short-term microplastic exposure can quietly alter gut bacteria in animals, and since humans also ingest microplastics daily through food, water, and air, similar gut microbiome changes could potentially happen in people too, though longer-term studies are needed to know for sure.
Plastic ingestion and body condition of Wedge-tailed Shearwaters in Vanuatu
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists checked seabird chicks in a remote part of Vanuatu for signs of plastic pollution and found almost none of them had eaten plastic, and the birds were healthy and well-fed. This is good news because seabirds act like early-warning signals for ocean plastic pollution—when they're clean and healthy, it suggests that particular stretch of ocean isn't yet heavily contaminated, which matters since plastic that harms marine life can also work its way up the food chain toward the seafood we eat.
Birds as Bioindicators: Revealing the Widespread Impact of Microplastics
AI summary Read the abstract
This systematic review found microplastics in over 200 bird species across the globe, from Antarctica to South Europe. Birds can suffer gut damage, oxidative stress, and toxic chemical buildup from ingesting plastics — a warning sign for broader ecosystem and food chain contamination that could affect humans too.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.