0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Reimagining Florida's Plastic Policies and Co-Developing Management Alternatives

International Journal of Public and Private Perspectives on Healthcare Culture and the Environment 2025 Score: 38 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Melinda Paduani, Melinda Paduani, Melinda Paduani, Melinda Paduani, Melinda Paduani Melinda Paduani Melinda Paduani

Summary

This review examines Florida's fragmented plastic pollution policies and regulatory frameworks, identifying how preemption laws hinder comprehensive management and using stakeholder engagement to co-develop alternative strategies for reducing microplastic pollution. The study highlights the gap between current patchwork regulations and the systemic approaches needed to address plastics smaller than 5 mm.

The pervasiveness of plastics in society has resulted in diffuse policies to reduce plastic pollution. This patchwork makes identifying comprehensive management opportunities extremely challenging. Progress is further hindered by plastic regulation preemptions in several states, including Florida. To help clarify this ill-defined field, Florida policies in plastic management and regulatory frameworks that could be relevant are reviewed. This review provides context for a case study generating management alternatives for reducing plastic pollution including microplastics (plastics < 5 mm in size) in Miami-Dade County, Florida, USA. Stakeholders in waste management, water management, and the Everglades restoration were interviewed. Of six alternatives, creating a regional recycling cooperative and developing Best Management Practices guidelines for microplastics ranked the highest according to three policy analysis criteria: 1) effectiveness, 2) benefit and engagement of society, and 3) cost. This study fosters policy innovation in regions where plastic management is politically contentious.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper