We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Divergent filtration mechanisms of fibrous and non-fibrous microplastics in towing-net sampling toward a harmonized framework for abundance correction
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists found that the nets commonly used to measure microplastic pollution in water miss a lot of tiny plastic fibers—because fibers are flexible enough to bend and squeeze through mesh openings much smaller than their actual length, unlike other plastic fragments. This means past studies using standard nets likely underestimated fiber pollution by 1.4 to nearly 3 times, which matters because fibers (like those shed from synthetic clothing) are one of the most common types of microplastics found in water, food, and even our bodies—so getting accurate measurements is key to understanding our true exposure and health risks.
Accurate assessment of microplastic pollution is hampered by the lack of standardized sampling protocols, particularly regarding microplastics lost in sampling. This study investigates the filtering mechanisms of microplastics during surface towing sampling (i.e., mesh-filtered methods) and develops a framework to correct abundance data. Paired-gear experiments using neuston nets (mesh sizes of 50-500 μm) were conducted in Xiangshan Bay, China. Probabilities of relative retention and retention of microplastics on the meshes were analyzed using SELECT models, and master selection curves were derived for fibrous and non-fibrous microplastics. Results show that larger mesh sizes (150, 330, 500 μm) significantly underestimate microplastic abundance by 1.4 to 2.9 times compared to a 50-μm net, with fibers being the primary contributor to losses. The filtration mechanisms differ fundamentally between shapes. For non-fibrous microplastics, retention is governed by physical interactions between the mesh opening and the particle's shortest diameter. In contrast, the fibrous microplastics sample could slip through the mesh vertically, but the ability of fibers to slip through the mesh is not determined by a simple size-exclusion rule. Their high flexibility allows bending and passage even at lengths far exceeding the mesh size. When the fiber length exceeds a certain ratio relative to the mesh size, further increasing the fiber length no longer significantly affects fiber retention. Based on the master selection curve, a harmonized assessment framework was established to re-evaluate data from 27 previous studies. The resulting mesh-specific correction factors highlight the severe underestimation of fibers by commonly used nets (e.g., 330 μm). This study clarifies shape-dependent filtration mechanisms in mesh-filtered sampling and provides a practical tool to enhance the comparability of historical and future microplastic monitoring data, advocating for standardized use of sampling net with smaller mesh sizes for accurate fiber assessment.
More Papers Like This
Size selection in sampling nets leads to underestimation of microplastic pollution
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers developed a new model to account for the size-dependent retention biases of sampling nets used in microplastic pollution monitoring. They found that nets with a 330-micrometer mesh underestimated microplastic fiber concentrations by approximately 45% and fragment concentrations by about 30% compared to a finer 92-micrometer mesh. The study provides a framework for correcting these biases, which could significantly improve the accuracy and comparability of microplastic pollution assessments across studies.
Size and shape matter: A preliminary analysis of microplastic sampling technique in seawater studies with implications for ecological risk assessment
AI summary Read the abstract
This study showed that sampling with coarse-mesh towed nets significantly underestimates microplastic concentrations in seawater, particularly for fibrous particles, raising concerns about the accuracy of published abundance estimates.
What is not seen: High levels of fibers below the sea surface revealed by a multisampler survey
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists found that the tiny nets typically used to measure ocean plastic pollution massively underestimate the problem, when they sampled just below the surface instead of skimming the top, they found thousands of times more plastic fibers (likely from clothing and textiles) than surface samples suggested. This matters because these fibers are entering the marine food chain largely undetected, meaning our current methods may be dramatically underestimating how much plastic is in the seafood we eat and the water ecosystems we depend on.
Are we underestimating microplastic abundance in the marine environment? A comparison of microplastic capture with nets of different mesh-size
AI summary Read the abstract
By sampling marine water simultaneously with 333 µm and finer nets, researchers demonstrated that standard 333 µm sampling nets miss the majority of microplastics present, with finer nets capturing orders of magnitude more particles and revealing severe underestimation in existing abundance data.
Sampling microfibres at the sea surface: The effects of mesh size, sample volume and water depth
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers examined how mesh size, sample volume, and water depth affect microfibre sampling at the sea surface, finding that fibre density increased substantially as mesh size decreased from 63 to 20 micrometres, highlighting significant underestimation in traditional 300-500 micrometer net surveys.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.