0
Article Tier 2 Sign in to save

Analytical Techniques for Microplastics in Drinking Water

2026

AI summary Read the abstract

Tiny plastic particles have been showing up in our drinking water, and scientists are still working out the best ways to detect and measure them—this review compares the main tools available, from simple visual checks to advanced techniques like infrared and Raman spectroscopy that can spot particles as small as 1 micrometer (much thinner than a human hair). The big takeaway: there's no single agreed-upon method yet for testing water safety, which makes it harder to know exactly how much plastic we're actually consuming and to set consistent safety standards—something researchers say needs to be fixed soon.

Study Type Environmental

Microplastic (MP) pollution is an emerging issue in recent years. Research has confirmed that the existence of MP is found surprisingly in drinking water. Research on the analytical technique for MPs in different drinking water sources is highlighted in this review. In general, pre-treatment for MP detection in drinking water is simpler since it contains lesser particles and organic matters. Currently, the detectable particle size is ranged from 50 nm to 5000 μm in drinking water. For basic physical characterisation, visual inspection is a simple and direct analytical method with lower cost, though it is subjective and cannot identify polymer types. For definitive chemical characterisation, spectroscopic techniques are standard. Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy is well-suited for the automated analysis of particles larger than 20 μm, while Raman spectroscopy excels at identifying the molecular structure of smaller particles, down to 1 μm, albeit with longer analysis times. For mass quantification, pyrolysis-gas chromatography mass spectrometry (Py-GCMS) offers a comprehensive analysis of MPs and can be considered a feasible method for various sample matrices; however, it is destructive and lacks information on size distribution. Moreover, the analysis can be complex due to the products from pyrolysis, whereas a total organic carbon (TOC) analyser offers a rapid and simple alternative for measuring MP-carbon mass, though it yields no morphological information. Lack of standardisation of method creates a challenge in MP detection. MP pollution is an ongoing environmental concern; it must be addressed. Therefore, standardisation of detection method and further studies should be considered.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Advanced analytical techniques for assessing and detecting microplastic pollution in water and wastewater systems

AI summary Read the abstract

This review evaluates the various laboratory methods available for detecting and measuring microplastics in water and wastewater, including spectroscopy, thermal analysis, and newer combined techniques. Each method has different strengths and limitations in terms of what particle sizes they can detect and how accurately they identify plastic types. The review helps researchers choose the right tools for measuring microplastic contamination, which is essential for understanding how much microplastic people are exposed to through drinking water.

Article Tier 2

Microplastic pollution: a review of techniques to identify microplastics and their threats to the aquatic ecosystem

AI summary Read the abstract

This review summarizes existing research on methods for identifying microplastics in water and their effects on aquatic ecosystems. The paper covers detection techniques like infrared and Raman spectroscopy and discusses how microplastics threaten aquatic organisms through ingestion and entanglement. Since these contaminated organisms enter the human food chain, the findings underscore why understanding aquatic microplastic pollution matters for human health.

Article Tier 2

Monitoring and decontamination technologies for removing waterborne micro- and nanoplastic contaminants

AI summary Read the abstract

Tiny plastic particles too small to see are showing up in our drinking water, and scientists are still working out the best ways to detect and remove them. This paper reviews existing tools for spotting these microplastics in water and the technologies being developed to filter them out, highlighting where current methods fall short and what improvements are needed. Since research increasingly links microplastic exposure to potential health concerns, better detection and cleanup tools could be an important step toward safer drinking water in the future.

Article Tier 2

It matters how we measure - Quantification of microplastics in drinking water by μFTIR and μRaman

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared two different spectroscopy methods for measuring microplastics in drinking water from a Danish waterworks and found significantly different results depending on which technique was used. The infrared method showed higher removal efficiency than the Raman method, largely because each technique detects different size ranges of particles. The study highlights that how we measure microplastics matters enormously, and standardized methods are needed for reliable drinking water assessments.

Review Tier 2

Microplastics in Water: A Review of Characterization and Removal Methods

AI summary Read the abstract

This review surveys seven methods for identifying microplastics in water and evaluates their strengths and limitations, from simple visual inspection to advanced spectroscopy techniques. Researchers also assessed current removal strategies, including filtration, coagulation, and biodegradation, highlighting what works and what still needs improvement. The study provides a practical reference for selecting the right tools to detect and address microplastic contamination in water systems.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper