We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Pollution versus biopollution? Failure of Xenostrobus securis invasion in a heavily polluted estuary of the Bay of Biscay
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists studying mussels in polluted Spanish estuaries found that some mussels—both native and invasive species—contained levels of toxic metals (cadmium and mercury) that exceeded safe limits for human consumption, while others from cleaner areas were fine to eat. Interestingly, the invasive mussel species soaked up more microplastic pollution than the native mussels, which may actually help protect the native species by absorbing more of the harmful plastic particles. The takeaway: if you eat mussels, where they come from matters, and this research shows why we need stronger pollution controls to keep our seafood safe.
Invasive species tolerant to pollution may gain a competitive advantage in contaminated environments. This study aimed to assess the accumulation of microplastics (MPs) and heavy metals (HMs) in native ( Mytilus galloprovincialis ) and invasive ( Xenostrobus securis ) mussels in three estuaries - Avilés, Nalón, and Ribadesella – in the Southwest Bay of Biscay, Spain. X. securis invaded the Avilés estuary a decade ago, but current sampling indicates that its population is now declining (< 4%), with no expansion to other Asturian estuaries. X. securis exhibited significantly higher concentrations and bioconcentration of MPs. Some individuals of both species in Avilés had Cd and Hg levels (μg kg −1 ), that exceeded the permitted limits for human consumption, whereas most Mytilus from Nalón and Ribadesella remained within safe limits. Multiple regression analyses revealed that, while the pollutants analysed did not affect the condition of M. galloprovincialis , Cd had a potential negative effect on X. securis . The spatial arrangement of X. securis , often growing on M. galloprovincialis in multispecies assemblages, suggests complex species interactions. X. securis may indirectly benefit native mussels by retaining MPs, since its filtration rate is higher. These findings improve understanding of pollutant accumulation in native and invasive species and highlight the urgent need for stringent control of HMs pollution in the region, due to the presence of unsafe mussels.
More Papers Like This
Microplastic ingestion in mussels from the East Mediterranean Sea: Exploring its impacts in nature and controlled conditions
AI summary Read the abstract
Mussels from fish farms in the eastern Mediterranean had the highest microplastic contamination, likely from plastic aquaculture equipment, while mussels from a Marine Protected Area had the lowest. The study found that higher microplastic levels in mussels were linked to measurable signs of oxidative stress, DNA damage, and nerve toxicity, showing that these filter-feeding shellfish -- commonly eaten by people -- are actively harmed by the plastic particles they ingest.
The effect of different types of microplastic and acute cadmium exposure on the Mytilus galloprovincialis (Lamarck, 1819)
AI summary Read the abstract
This study examined how different types of microplastics, alone and combined with cadmium, affect Mediterranean mussels that are widely consumed as seafood. Exposure to microplastics and cadmium caused oxidative stress, tissue damage, and neurotoxicity in the mussels, with combined exposure being worse than either pollutant alone. The health risk calculations for human consumers exceeded safety limits, suggesting that microplastic-contaminated mussels could pose a real food safety concern.
Is Mytilaster lineatus a suitable bioindicator of microplastic pollution? Insights from field surveys, laboratory experiments, and bioaccumulation indices in the Caspian Sea.
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists studying tiny mussels in the Caspian Sea found that smaller mussels absorb more microplastic per body weight, and mussels mostly pick up plastic from water rather than sediment—meaning these mussels could serve as an early warning system for plastic pollution, but the results depend heavily on mussel size and location, making them an imperfect single measuring tool. This matters because mussels and similar shellfish are commonly eaten by people, so understanding how they absorb microplastics helps researchers better estimate our own exposure through seafood and improve pollution monitoring methods.
Microplastics from marine exposed and pristine plastics as potential vectors of cadmium toxicity in mussels Mytilus galloprovincialis
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists found that tiny plastic particles in the ocean can carry toxic cadmium and deliver it to mussels, but surprisingly, the plastic-bound cadmium was actually less harmful than cadmium alone, possibly because the metal doesn't fully release from the plastic once eaten. Interestingly, plastics that had already been weathered by sun and seawater picked up less cadmium than fresh plastic. Since mussels and other seafood are a major way microplastics and their hitchhiking pollutants enter the human food chain, this research helps clarify how much of a risk these combined pollutants actually pose to the mar
Microplastics in marine mussels, biological effects and human risk of intake: A case study in a multi-stressor environment
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers tracked microplastic contamination in mussels from the Douro estuary in Portugal across seasons and estimated that people who eat mussels from this area consume about 2,400 to 2,650 microplastic particles per year. While the contamination levels were relatively low compared to other studies, the mussels still showed signs of biological stress. This study provides one of the first direct estimates of how many microplastics people ingest through shellfish consumption.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.