We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Leaching kinetics and release mechanisms of microplastics/nanoparticles from medical personal protective equipment into physiological fluids: A hidden occupational hazard
AI summary Read the abstract
Medical masks, gowns, and other protective gear worn by healthcare workers can shed tiny plastic particles that get absorbed into sweat and body fluids—and sweat actually released more of these particles than fluids meant to mimic the body's internal environment. While current exposure levels appear to fall within safety limits, the researchers estimate that healthcare workers wearing this gear daily could accumulate significant plastic exposure over time, raising questions about long-term health effects that haven't been fully studied yet.
Currently, research on microplastics (MPs) primarily focuses on natural environmental media, while medical waste and personal protective equipment are emerging as overlooked sources of MPs and nanoparticles release. Research on personal protective equipment as a source of MPs remains limited. This study quantified MPs release from ten types of personal protective equipment into body fluid and sweat. Our work provides the first systematic analysis of dynamic MPs release from personal protective equipment under surgical procedures. Total release in sweat substantially exceeded that in body fluid. MPs release was governed by material structure, liquid medium, and exposed area. Although high-porosity materials exhibited elevated unit release, actual exposure depended on usable surface area. The released MPs contained multiple polymer types, primarily in the form of fragments and fibers. Mean particle sizes were 57.17 ± 16.75 μm in body fluid and 45.00 ± 12.34 μm in sweat, indicating smaller particles prevalence. Average nanoparticle concentrations reached 5.2 × 10 particles/mL in body fluid and 7.2 × 10 particles/mL in sweat. Leaching kinetics demonstrated first-order diffusion in nonwovens (R>0.97), whereas coated fabrics exhibited zero-order kinetics at 1.2 × 10 particlesmL·h. Health-risk assessment indicated non-carcinogenic hazard indices and carcinogenic risk below safety thresholds. However, both models estimated high annual exposure levels for healthcare professionals, suggesting potential long-term health risks that warrant further investigation. Analysis of the release mechanism reveals that non-woven materials are governed by internal diffusion, whereas surface-coated materials follow a surface-controlled release pattern. These findings provide critical data on MPs release and associated occupational risks.
More Papers Like This
Human occupational exposure to microplastics: A cross-sectional study in a plastic products manufacturing plant
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers measured microplastic exposure in 19 workers at a plastic products factory in Iran by sampling their skin, hair, and saliva before and after work shifts. They found 4,802 microplastic particles across all samples, with hair collecting the most and saliva the least. The study shows that people working directly with plastics face significantly higher microplastic exposure, and that protective equipment like gloves and masks can help reduce it.
Medical Devices as an Emerging Source of Human Exposure to Microplastics and Nanoplastics: A Critical Review
AI summary Read the abstract
This review summarizes existing research on medical devices, such as masks, gloves, syringes, IV bags and tubing, as a source of tiny plastic particles released during manufacturing and use. Particle release depends on factors like material type, temperature, and mechanical stress, and devices connected directly to the bloodstream raise particular concern since particles could bypass the gut and lungs.
Assessment of inhalation exposure to microplastic particles when disposable masks are repeatedly used
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers assessed whether reusing disposable medical masks leads to inhalation exposure to microplastics by testing masks under simulated wearing conditions. They found that hand-rubbed new masks released approximately 1.5 times more microplastic particles than untouched ones, and reused masks released even more through physical abrasion. The predominant particles were polypropylene and polyethylene fragments, raising concerns about repeated mask use as a source of microplastic inhalation.
Exudation of microplastics from commonly used face masks in COVID-19 pandemic
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers simulated real-world mask usage and found that commonly used face masks — including surgical and cloth types — shed measurable quantities of microplastic particles that could be inhaled by the wearer, raising concerns about respiratory exposure during prolonged mask use.
Release kinetics of microplastics from disposable face masks into the aqueous environment
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers measured microplastic release from three types of disposable face masks into water over 24 hours, characterizing the release kinetics and identifying mask type and environmental conditions as key factors affecting microplastic shedding rates.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.