0
Article Tier 2 Sign in to save

Risk-Based Identification and Prioritisation of Plastic Waste Hotspots in Malawi Using a Transferable Decision Framework

AI summary Read the abstract

In Malawi's capital city, only 10-30% of daily trash gets collected, leaving plastic waste to pile up in drains, markets, and riverbanks—creating breeding grounds for disease-carrying bacteria, flooding, and toxic fumes from open burning. This research paper reviews existing evidence and proposes a practical two-step plan: first, quickly clean up the most dangerous waste hotspots, then tackle the root causes (like poor waste services and policy gaps) for lasting change. While built for Malawi, the approach could help other developing countries facing similar plastic pollution problems protect public health with limited res

Plastic waste presents a significant environmental and public health concern in Malawi, where rapid urban growth, limited waste collection services, and informal disposal practices contribute to persistent plastic waste hotspots. In Lilongwe City, the waste collection rate has been reported ranges from 10% to 30%. This means that out of the 500 to 600 tons of municipal solid waste produced each day, only about 50 to 150 tons are collected daily. These hotspots occur in settings such as drains, markets, settlement edges, riverbanks, and lakeshore environments. They intensify health-relevant exposure pathways by encouraging stagnant water, increasing flood risk, facilitating open burning, and supporting the formation of plastisphere biofilms that can contain pathogenic and antimicrobial resistant organisms. This research synthesises evidence on the main sources of plastic waste in Malawi, the mechanisms of leakage across different environments, and the associated health implications. It uses a scoping approach aligned with PRISMA-ScR guidance and is informed by the UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) funded Sustainable Plastic Attitudes to benefit Communities and their Environments (SPACES project), which highlights the influence of behavioural, governance, and environmental factors on plastic pollution. A two phase, risk-based decision framework to support targeted management of plastic waste hotspots is described. Phase 1 focuses on rapid harm reduction through the identification and ranking of hotspots according to risk severity, spatial extent, and feasibility, guiding timely interventions such as drain clearance, waste capture, and temporary stabilisation. Phase 2 addresses longer term prevention by tackling upstream drivers through policy measures, improved services, reuse and reduction schemes, and community engagement. The framework has been developed using evidence from Malawi; however, its methodology could be applied to other low- and middle-income countries that experience similar constraints and exposure pathways. The framework offers a transparent and practical tool for decision makers seeking to allocate limited resources effectively while reducing environmental and health risks associated with plastic waste.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Plastic waste dynamics and governance challenges in urban Malawi

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers found that plastic waste—mostly single-use bags and sachets—blankets cities across Malawi fairly evenly, rather than piling up in just a few spots. Surveys showed almost everyone knows plastic pollution is a problem, but very few people recycle, not because they don't care, but because there's simply nowhere for them to recycle. This matters because widespread, poorly managed plastic waste breaks down into microplastics that can contaminate water, soil, and food, so fixing the problem requires better recycling infrastructure and policies, not just more public awareness campaigns.

Article

Mapping Mismanaged Plastic Waste in Indonesia: Subdistrict-level Analysis through Material Flow from Sources to the Environment

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers conducted sub-district-level material flow analysis across Indonesia to map where plastic waste is mismanaged most severely, moving beyond national aggregates to pinpoint local hotspots where leakage into the environment is highest and targeted intervention would have the greatest impact.

Article Tier 2

Investigation on Plastic Wastes in Nyamasheke District, Rwanda: Quantification, Characterization and Management Framework Design

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers studied plastic waste in rural Rwandan markets and found that even though almost everyone knew about the country's plastic bag ban, most plastic waste (mainly bottles and food wrappers) was still being burned or dumped in the open rather than properly disposed of. Burning plastic releases toxic chemicals into the air, and dumping it contaminates soil and water — both of which can expose nearby communities to harmful substances through breathing, drinking water, or food grown in polluted soil. The findings show that banning certain plastics isn't enough on its own — real change also requires better trash collection systems and disposal habits, a l

Article Tier 2

Identification of plastic waste generation and composition to reduce environmental disaster risk (case study: Public facility sources in Padang City)

AI summary Read the abstract

A study in Padang City, Indonesia characterized plastic waste generation and composition at public facilities including parks, beaches, and roads as a first step toward reducing environmental disaster risk, finding that plastic waste from these sources poses significant risks of microplastic contamination in adjacent aquatic ecosystems.

Review

A review of plastic waste circular actions in seven developing countries to achieve sustainable development goals

AI summary Read the abstract

Review of plastic waste circular economy actions in 7 developing countries; calls to scale pilots and build international partnerships.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper