0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Nanoplastics Sign in to save

Evaluation of the performance of Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA) for the measurement of nanoplastics

Food Safety and Risk 2025 4 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 48 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Ruud Peters, Ruud Peters, Ruud Peters, Ruud Peters, Emma Relou, Anna K. Undas Ruud Peters, Anna K. Undas Ruud Peters, Ruud Peters, Emma Relou, Ruud Peters, Ruud Peters, Ruud Peters, Ruud Peters, Emma Relou, Emma Relou, Eelco Sijtsma, Ruud Peters, Ruud Peters, Eelco Sijtsma, Eelco Sijtsma, Eelco Sijtsma, Anna K. Undas Anna K. Undas Anna K. Undas Anna K. Undas Anna K. Undas Anna K. Undas Anna K. Undas Ruud Peters, Ruud Peters, Ruud Peters, Ruud Peters, Anna K. Undas Anna K. Undas

Summary

Researchers developed and tested a method called nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) for detecting nanoplastics — plastic particles smaller than one micrometer — and applied it to eight brands of bottled mineral water. While the technique successfully detected particles in the 110–170 nanometer range in every brand tested, the method cannot distinguish plastic from other natural particles, so the results represent total particle content rather than confirmed nanoplastic counts.

Abstract In recent years, microplastics have been detected in fresh- and seawater, the atmosphere, sediments, soils, sewage sludge, biota, and food. However, these microplastics can degrade into even smaller plastic particles in the sub-micron range, referred to as nanoplastics. Due to their smaller dimensions and colloidal properties, nanoplastics could pose an increased hazard to the environment, biota and humans. While there are methods for detecting microplastics, the reliable detection and quantification of size and particle number concentrations of plastic particles less than a micrometre in size are still difficult. In this study, we describe the development and validation of a method for detecting nanoplastics using nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) and discuss the limitations of the method in the analysis of nanoplastics. Our method proved accurate and precise for 102 nm polystyrene Nanospheres, with a linear concentration ranging from 5.0 × 10 6 to 2.0 × 10 9 particles/mL, and a particle size range from 46 to over 350 nm. However, several limitations of the NTA method became apparent. When measuring polydisperse particle mixtures, NTA tends to underestimate the presence of smaller particles due to lower scattering intensity and overlapping signals. Moreover, NTA cannot chemically discriminate between nanoplastics and other types of nanoparticles, such as natural organic matter, leading to potential overestimation of plastic particle concentrations. Despite these weaknesses, the validated method was applied to eight brands of bottled mineral water. We detected particles with mean particle sizes in the range of 110 to 170 nm, and particle number concentrations between 1.0 × 10 6 to 2.2 × 10 7 particles/mL. Particle size distributions showed a particle size range of 50 to 500 nm. However, due to the limitations of NTA, it was not possible to conclusively confirm that the detected particles were nanoplastics, and therefore, the reported concentrations refer to the total particle content rather than specifically to nanoplastics.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper