0
Systematic Review Tier 1 Sign in to save

Marine life under plastic threat: A systematic review of systematic reviews.

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers conducted a systematic review of 34 existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses on marine plastic ecotoxicology, finding substantial heterogeneity in reported effects driven by taxonomy, polymer type, and experimental conditions—and that 74% of reviews were rated critically low quality under AMSTAR 2—calling for harmonized methodologies and greater ecological realism to support evidence-based marine plastic policy.

Study Type Review

Despite rapid advances in research on plastic pollution in marine ecosystems, inconsistencies in reported effects continue to hinder a clear understanding of its mechanisms and impacts. Here, we present a novel and integrative approach, namely a systematic review of existing systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs), to assess the available evidence and identify potential factors underlying conflicting results concerning the ecotoxicological, ecophysiological, and functional effects of plastic exposure across diverse marine taxa at multiple levels of biological organisation. A total of 34 SRs/MAs, published between 2018 and 2024 and synthesizing 1176 primary studies, were included. Our findings reveal substantial heterogeneity in observed effects, driven by taxonomic and plastic-type variability, and experimental conditions. Notably, while the overlap among SRs/MAs was minimal (Corrected Covered Area = 1.8 %), indicating limited redundancy but strong thematic specialization of research on marine plastic impact, methodological quality was generally poor, with 74 % of SRs/MAs classified as "critically low" according to the AMSTAR 2 framework. By systematically identifying knowledge gaps and key limitations (i.e., heterogeneous methodologies, strong taxonomic and plastic-size biases, and low ecological realism), this novel approach lays a valuable foundation for guiding future research directions. In addition, it highlights the need for harmonized procedures and enhanced methodological rigour to inform evidence-based policy decision on marine plastic pollution.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Data driven methods to increase the reliability of microplastics hazard assessment

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers applied data-driven methods to synthesize microplastic ecotoxicology studies and improve the reliability of hazard assessments for organisms. The analysis identified systematic biases in the existing literature and proposed statistical approaches to generate more robust effect size estimates.

Meta Analysis Tier 1

What is known and unknown about the effects of plastic pollution: A meta‐analysis and systematic review

AI summary Read the abstract

This meta-analysis and systematic review pools data from hundreds of studies to assess whether plastic pollution, both large pieces and microplastics, poses a real ecological threat. The findings confirm negative effects on wildlife across many species and environments, underscoring that plastic pollution is not just an aesthetic problem but a genuine risk to ecosystems and the food chains humans rely on.

Article Tier 2

Data driven methods to increase the reliability of microplastics hazard assessment

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers applied statistical data-driven methods to improve the reliability of microplastic hazard assessments derived from a growing but inconsistent body of ecotoxicology literature. The analysis identified key study characteristics that explain variability in reported effect sizes.

Meta Analysis Tier 1

Blueprint for the ideal microplastic effect study: Critical issues of current experimental approaches and envisioning a path forward

AI summary Read the abstract

A double-weighted meta-analysis incorporating both experimental quality and statistical precision found that most published microplastic effect studies depart substantially from ecologically relevant experimental design, particularly in failing to mimic natural environments. The framework provides a quantitative benchmark for improving the rigor and generalizability of future microplastic toxicity research.

Article Tier 2

Plastic pollution: Where are we regarding research and risk assessment in support of management and regulation?

AI summary Read the abstract

This review assessed the current state of microplastic research and risk assessment, concluding that more exposure-response studies using standardized methods and material-specific metrics are needed to support effective management and regulation of plastic pollution.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper