We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Fashion fades, microplastics are eternal: a critical systematic literature review to assess microplastic fibre colours in environmental samples
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers conducted a systematic review of 80 studies on microplastic fiber colors across air, water, sediment, and biota, finding that transparent, blue, and black fibers dominate globally but with compartment-specific patterns — blue fibers lead in biota and water while transparent fibers prevail in sediments — and identifying major gaps in standardized color reporting methods.
Abstract Microplastic pollution is a growing environmental concern that requires assessment of a range of parameters. Colour remains a largely overlooked parameter in environmental monitoring, yet a potentially important one from a biological perspective. This systematic review covers 80 peer-reviewed studies published between 2000 and 2020, and addresses microplastic fibres colours across diverse environmental compartments: air, water, sediment and biota. Our analysis reveals that transparent/translucent (T&T), blue, black, and white fibres are the most frequently reported colours globally, with notable variation across environmental compartments and geographical regions. Blue fibres were predominant in biota (32.8%) and water (28.3%), while T&T fibres were prevalent in sediments (35.2%), and yellow fibres in air (27.4%). Europe and Asia showed the highest colour variability. Spatial patterns emerged with blue fibres more commonly reported in North and South America and Oceania, and red and green fibres being predominant in the African continent. No link was found between fashion colour trends and fibre colours in the environment. Our findings highlight data gaps in methodologies and reporting, particularly in distinguishing between synthetic and natural fibres. Given the relevance of colour in ecological interactions and in pollutants traceability, employing standardised colour categorisation methodologies can improve the reliability of environmental monitoring efforts.
More Papers Like This
Synthetic microfibers in the marine environment: A review on their occurrence in seawater and sediments.
AI summary Read the abstract
This review synthesized available data on synthetic microfiber concentrations in marine seawater and sediments, finding fibers in all reviewed studies and noting that blue fibers and polypropylene are the most common types. The review highlights the lack of standardized sampling and reporting methods, making cross-study comparisons difficult.
Microfibres and bivalves: A review of their occurrence and analysis
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers synthesized 107 studies on microfibre contamination in bivalves — spanning mussels, oysters, and clams — finding polypropylene and polyester fibres dominated and blue was the most common color, while identifying major methodological inconsistencies in digestion protocols and polymer identification that currently prevent meaningful cross-study comparisons.
Percentage composition of color of microplastic: A) sediment, B) water.
AI summary Read the abstract
This study presents color composition data for microplastics detected in sediment and water samples, characterizing the distribution of different color categories across both environmental matrices.
Assessment of Microplastics in the Environment – Fibres: the Disregarded Twin?
AI summary Read the abstract
This paper argues that synthetic fibers are systematically underestimated in environmental microplastic monitoring because they are often excluded from sampling protocols. Since synthetic textiles are ubiquitous and shed fibers through washing and wear, ignoring fibers means current assessments substantially undercount total microplastic environmental pollution.
Marine environment microfiber contamination: Global patterns and the diversity of microparticle origins
AI summary Read the abstract
Global patterns of microfiber contamination in the marine environment were reviewed, documenting that synthetic and non-synthetic fibers are found in all major ocean basins, with fibers being the most common microplastic type along shorelines. The review highlights that non-synthetic and semi-synthetic fibers are frequently overlooked in monitoring despite being a significant component of total microfiber pollution.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.