0
Systematic Review Tier 1 Sign in to save

Assessing environmental and sustainability impacts of intentionally used microplastics from recycled tires in third-generation pitches: A Great Britain case study

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers reviewed the scientific and policy landscape around crumb rubber from recycled tires used in synthetic sports pitches, finding that the microplastics it releases produce ecotoxic effects that cannot be adequately contained, and that Great Britain's regulatory response relies on incomplete evidence that diverges from precautionary environmental standards.

Study Type Review

Crumb rubber from recycled tires is widely used in synthetic sports pitches despite environmental and health concerns. The study presents a case study that draws, first, on existing relevant scientific literature, though it does not constitute a systematic review. Second, it identifies the chemical composition of crumb rubber and examines its environmental and public health effects. These two strands inform the subsequent policy and regulatory analysis of the limited number of policy documents from Great Britain, along with a consultancy report, addressing crumb rubber and third-generation (3G) pitches. Research shows that crumb microplastics are present and, according to the European Union, they produce a range of negative (eco)toxic and physical effects on living organisms, and cannot be contained effectively. Crumb rubber, therefore, cannot be used sustainably within Europe’s circular economy and zero-plastic-pollution policies. Available policy alternatives were briefly considered in relation to risk assessments, life-cycle analyses, industry economic interests, and governmental and sporting-body sustainability policies. Finally, an analysis was provided on how government bodies, local authorities, and sports organizations have started to interpret and implement the consultancy report. Great Britain’s policies appear to be partly based on flawed, incomplete, and selective assessments of evidence, with asymmetrical risk assessments. Nevertheless, they closely align with and reflect many of the policies and practices adopted by international sports bodies concerning 3G pitch materials. Questions remain regarding how precautionary public health and sustainability policies for crumb rubber derived from used tires and other sources can be improved.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

From the spread of microplastics to taking action through participation in politics and management : Stakeholders perspectives on the preconditions for implementing environmental policies with the aim to reduce the spread of microplastics from facilities containing molded rubber granules

AI summary Read the abstract

This paper examines the environmental consequences of microplastics shed from rubber granule surfaces used in artificial turf, arguing that growing scientific evidence of harm should drive political action and regulation.

Article Tier 2

Fate of recycled tyre granulate used on artificial turf

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers reviewed the environmental fate of recycled tyre rubber granulate used as infill on artificial turf fields, finding that while the material provides significant CO2 savings compared to alternatives, dispersal of approximately 3,000-5,000 kg per field per year to surrounding environments raises microplastic pollution concerns.

Review Tier 2

Artificial sport surfaces and adverse effects for human health. A literature review

AI summary Read the abstract

This literature review evaluates health risks from artificial sport surfaces using recycled tire rubber infill, finding that the EU classifies rubber granules as microplastics and that their hazardous chemical content raises bio-accessibility concerns especially for children using playgrounds.

Article Tier 2

A comparison of two rotational traction test devices for artificial turf

AI summary Read the abstract

Despite its title referencing microplastic infills, this paper studies sports pitch traction testing — not microplastic pollution. It examines the mechanical performance of two rotational traction test devices when used on artificial turf pitches infilled with natural alternatives (cork, olive pits, wood) that have replaced banned microplastic rubber crumb, and is not primarily relevant to microplastics or human health.

Article Tier 2

Quantifying the Sustainability of Football (Soccer) Pitches: A Comparison of Artificial and Natural Turf Pitches with a Focus on Microplastics and Their Environmental Impacts

AI summary Read the abstract

A comparative life cycle assessment of artificial turf and natural grass football pitches found that artificial turf generates substantial microplastic emissions, particularly from rubber crumb infill, with total environmental impacts differing by metric.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper