0
Meta Analysis ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 1 ? Systematic review or meta-analysis. Synthesizes findings across many studies. Strongest evidence. Sign in to save

Scaling, performance, and quality: Machine-Learning evidence for how WWTP and compost processes shape microplastics

Environmental Research 2026

Summary

Researchers applied machine learning with SHAP analysis to 635 records from 99 wastewater treatment studies and identified a narrow operational window — total plastic removal near 93–96% and daily capacity below 300,000 m³/day — that minimizes downstream microplastic burdens, while meta-analysis confirmed that membrane bioreactors concentrate the highest microplastic loads in sludge.

Study Type Review

Composting is a key pathway for microplastics (MPs) to enter soils via organic waste. Based on 635 records from 99 studies, MP abundance was higher in sludge-based and mixed composts than in plant-derived materials. Meta-analysis of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) found that primary clarification removed the most MPs. Among secondary treatments, MBR sludge had the highest MP levels - 68.53% higher than SBR and 5.6% higher than CAS. The machine-learning models (random forest with SHAP and partial dependence) were used to resolve actionable process levers with R > 0.72 for WWTP process technologies and >0.77 for scenario prediction. Two parameters dominated: total plastic removal rate (TPR) and daily treatment capacity (DTC), with an operational window (TPR ≈ 92.5-96% and DTC <300,000 m/d) minimizing downstream MP burdens. Finally, Scenario projections suggest two mitigation pathways: source control to reduce influent loads and performance-based upgrades to sludge handling.

Share this paper