0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Human Health Effects Sign in to save

In situ evaluation of genotoxicity and cytotoxicity associated with microplastics in an intertidal clam, Gafrarium divaricatum (Gmelin, 1791)

Marine Pollution Bulletin 2025 2 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 58 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
M Harshavarthini, Shubra Singh, Shubra Singh, Prem Kumar, Prem Kumar, K.A. Martin Xavier, Saurav Kumar, Nalini Poojary, Madhuri Pathak, Kiran D. Rasal, Gajanan S. Ghode, N. S. Nagpure

Summary

Researchers conducted the first comprehensive field assessment of microplastic contamination in water, sediment, and clams along the Maharashtra coast of India, finding plastic particles at all five sampling stations. They found that microplastics were causing measurable DNA damage and cellular abnormalities in the clams, with damage levels correlating to contamination intensity at each location. The study provides direct in-the-field evidence that microplastic pollution is actively harming the genetic and cellular health of coastal marine organisms.

Study Type Environmental

Microplastics (MP) are an emerging contaminant posing a significant threat to aquatic biota. While numerous studies have documented diverse pollutant abundances along the Maharashtra coast, in situ data on their impacts are lacking. This study presents the first comprehensive assessment of the spatial distribution of MP in water, sediments, and clams (Gafrarium divaricatum), and evaluates their toxicity. Five sampling stations Aksa (S1), Bandra (S2), Alibagh (S3), Shrivardhan (S4), and Ratnagiri (S5) were selected. Microplastics were quantified and characterized using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and a stereo-zoom microscope. Genotoxicity and cytotoxicity were assessed using the comet and clam micronucleus cytome assays (CMNCyt), respectively. Microplastics were abundant in sediment (13,646.35 ± 4565.8 items/kg), followed by water (617.77 ± 214.93 items/L) and clam tissues (74.17 ± 24.80 items/individual). Comet assay showed that % tail DNA, an indicator of DNA damage, ranged from 8.78 ± 0.84 % (Site S5) to 21.15 ± 0.95 % (Site S2) in gill cells, and from 9.33 ± 0.41 % (Site S5) to 23.95 ± 1.38 % (Site S2) in intestine cells. Similarly, cytome assay revealed a range of total cellular abnormalities from 3.14 % to 12.00 % in gill cells and from 5.27 % to 17.61 % in intestine cells. The occurrence of MP and toxicity assays in G. divaricatum indicated a decreasing trend in contamination from S2 to S5 (S2 > S1 > S3 > S4 > S5), reveal that MP has a serious concern for aquatic biota particularly in the Mumbai region, highlighting the need for remedial measures and policies to mitigate plastic pollution and promote sustainable coastal management.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Comparative study on the microplastics abundance, characteristics, and possible sources in yellow clams of different demographic regions of the northwest coast of India

Researchers measured microplastics in yellow clams collected from urban and rural coastal sites along northwest India, finding some of the highest contamination levels ever recorded globally — averaging 91 microplastic particles per individual clam. Clams from heavily populated areas showed worse health scores, suggesting microplastic exposure may be directly harming shellfish that people eat.

Article Tier 2

Assessment of microplastic contamination in clams and shrimp from estuarine environments of Goa: implications for environmental health and food safety

Researchers examined clams and shrimp from estuarine environments in Goa, India, and found microplastics present in both species and their surrounding waters, with shrimp from one site showing particularly high contamination and bioaccumulation. The particles were predominantly polyamide, polyethylene, and polystyrene fibers and fragments, likely originating from fishing, tourism, and waste disposal activities. The findings raise concerns about food safety for local and tourist populations who regularly consume seafood from these coastal areas.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics in the foreshore coastal waters, sediment, and coastal fauna of a highly populated megacity - A study on the effect of anthropogenic discharge on clams

Researchers documented microplastic contamination in coastal waters, sediments, and clams across three beaches of a highly populated Indian megacity, finding high abundances of up to 537.5 items per liter in water and significant bioaccumulation in clam soft tissues.

Article Tier 2

Evaluation of genotoxic and mutagenic potential of polystyrene nanoplastics in forked venus clam, Gafrarium divaricatum (Gmelin, 1791)

Researchers evaluated the genotoxic and mutagenic effects of polystyrene nanoplastics on an intertidal clam species over exposure periods of 96 hours and 15 days. They found significant time- and concentration-dependent DNA damage, micronuclei formation, and altered expression of stress and DNA repair genes in gill and intestinal tissues. The study demonstrates that nanoplastics can cause genetic damage in marine bivalves, raising concerns about their ecological impact.

Systematic Review Tier 1

Genotoxicity and Genomic Instability Induced by Micro- and Nanoplastics: A Comprehensive Multi-Taxa Mechanistic Review.

This review of existing research found that tiny plastic particles (microplastics and nanoplastics) can damage DNA in many different living things, from fish to human cells. The plastic particles cause this damage by creating harmful molecules called free radicals, disrupting the body's ability to repair DNA, and triggering inflammation. These findings suggest that the growing amount of plastic pollution in our environment could pose serious health risks to humans and wildlife.

Share this paper