We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Economic and environmental impacts of reprocessing household plastic waste at Øra, compared to transport and reprocessing in Germany
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared the economic and environmental impacts of processing household plastic waste locally in Norway versus shipping it to Germany for reprocessing, finding trade-offs between transportation emissions and processing efficiency. The analysis informs regional waste policy by quantifying the net environmental cost of cross-border plastic recycling.
Since the early 19-hundreds, plastics have been a valuable product for humans. Production has expanded throughout decades, leading to increased volumes of plastic waste. Insufficient treatment of plastic waste leads to numerous disadvantages for environment and humans. To minimize the negative effects, and sustain the value of the resource, plastic recycling is necessary. Reprocessing of plastic waste, including washing and extrusion, is a central part of this. As Norwegian household plastic waste is currently exported to Germany for this retreatment, research of running a plastic reprocessing plant in Norway was of interest. This study included two analyses investigating if a plastic reprocessing plant should be established at Øra in Fredrikstad, or if Norway should continue exporting household plastic waste to Germany. Data from two machine suppliers were compared in terms of costs and resource consumptions. First, a Net Present Value (NPV) analysis was conducted, including installation and 20-years operation of a facility at Øra. Secondly, an environmental analysis calculated and compared green house gas (GHG) emissions of two scenarios: (1) Operation of a plastic reprocessing plant at Øra, and (2) transport of plastic waste from Øra to Germany, including similar retreatment process in Germany. By using Life Cycle Assessment methodology, total green house gas emissions over the projects life time was presented, with use of different electricity mixes in both countries. Both the economic and environmental analyses showed net benefits of reprocessing household plastic waste at Øra. Best option resulted in a NPV of NOK 41,821,700, and net saving of CO2-equivalents during the life time between 15,304 - 72,914 tonnes. The NPV was most sensitive to change in plastic input amounts and variable costs, and the environmental analyses presented electricity mix as most decisive factor.
More Papers Like This
Plastic Packaging Waste Management in Iceland: Challenges and Opportunities from a Life Cycle Assessment Perspective
AI summary Read the abstract
This study analyzes Iceland's plastic packaging waste management system, mapping current infrastructure, regulatory gaps, and material flows to identify key barriers to improvement. The authors highlight challenges such as limited domestic recycling capacity and geographic isolation, while also pointing to opportunities including extended producer responsibility frameworks and increased public engagement. The findings provide a roadmap for Iceland to align its waste management practices with broader EU circular economy goals.
Economic and environmental optimisation of mixed plastic waste supply chains in Northern Italy comparing incineration and pyrolysis technologies
AI summary Read the abstract
This study used mathematical optimization to compare incineration versus pyrolysis for managing mixed plastic waste in Northern Italy, finding that incineration maximizes economic profit while pyrolysis significantly reduces greenhouse gas emissions — revealing a trade-off between financial and environmental outcomes.
Advancing Sustainable Energy: Environmental and Economic Assessment of Plastic Waste Gasification for Syngas and Electricity Generation Using Life Cycle Modeling
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers conducted a life cycle and economic assessment of gasifying plastic waste into syngas for electricity generation, finding that solar-powered gasification cuts climate impact by 44% and that a 50-ton-per-day plant can achieve a 2-year payback period with a net present value of $5.32 million over 20 years.
Life cycle assessment of plastic waste and energy recovery
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers investigated the vertical distribution of microplastics in open ocean water columns at stations across the North Atlantic, finding that particle concentrations were highest in subsurface waters rather than the surface mixed layer. Biofouling and association with marine snow were identified as mechanisms driving downward flux of buoyant polymers in the water column.
Optimization and Techno Economic Study of Plastic Waste Beneficiation with Production Simulation Approach Case Study at Cv. Pandu Kencana Jombang, East Java
AI summary Read the abstract
This paper presents a techno-economic analysis of a plastic waste recycling business that converts waste plastic into reusable raw material. Researchers modeled process optimization to assess both the financial viability and environmental benefit of such an operation.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.