0
Article Sign in to save

Kvantitativní srovnání publikací v oblasti znečištění prostředí mikroplasty a výdajů na výzkum a vývoj ve vybraných zemích EU

AI summary Read the abstract

This Czech bachelor's thesis compared the number of scientific publications on microplastic pollution with research and development expenditures across EU countries from 2009–2019. Analysis of 716 publications found the UK, Germany, and Italy led in output, while the Czech Republic showed relatively high R&D spending but low publication counts in this area.

Microplastic environmental pollution is a serious global problem that has recently been highlighted by research teams in economically advanced countries. The aim of this bachelor thesis is to compare data on published publications in the field of environmental pollution of microplastics and expenditures on research and development in the European Union for the period 2009–2019. The aim is to compare whether the level of expenditure can be reflected in the number of publications in this area and to evaluate whether this data can be used to assess the cost-effectiveness. Literary research concerns the issue of environmental contamination by plastics, their production, recycling and decomposition. Attention is also paid to microplastics in connection with contamination of the aquatic environment and the threat of living organisms due to the ingestion of these particles. The last part of the literature research deals with spending on research and development in the EU. The Web of Science Core Collection was used to elaborate the topic, analyzing publications on environmental pollution of microplastics from the point of view of the country's workplaces. Data from the European Union Statistical Office (Eurostat), expressed as a percentage of the country's GDP, were used to determine R&D expenditure. A total of 716 scientific publications were analyzed. The highest number of publications came from the United Kingdom, followed by Germany and Italy. After recalculation, the number of inhabitants was Slovenia, followed by Portugal and Denmark. The Czech Republic belongs to a group of countries that have higher spending on science and development, but a lower number of publications. The findings are in line with the Science, Research and Innovation Performance Report of the EU published by the European Commission in January 2018. The number of environmental publications about microplastics pollution has proven to be a useful indicator of the cost-effectiveness of science and development.

More Papers Like This

Review Tier 2

Global Trends in Research on Microplastic Contamination and River Water Quality: A Bibliometric Review

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers conducted a bibliometric analysis of global research trends on microplastic contamination and river water quality, mapping publication growth, geographic distribution of research, and key research themes from the scientific literature. The analysis reveals rapid growth in research volume with a geographic concentration in China and Europe.

Article Tier 2

A global analysis of microplastics research: Mapping strategic funding, national research capacity, scientific priorities, and policy frameworks

AI summary Read the abstract

Scientists looked at nearly 19,000 studies on microplastics and found something surprising: countries doing the most research aren't necessarily the ones with the worst plastic pollution—they're just the ones spending the most money on science, like China. This means places like Southeast Asia and Africa, which deal with heavy plastic pollution, often lack the funding to study how it's affecting their people's health, leaving major gaps in what we know about microplastics' risks worldwide. The researchers argue that fixing this funding imbalance isn't just fair—it's necessary if we want real answers about how microplastics affect human health everywhere, not just in

Article

Unveiling the data: An analysis of plastic waste with emphasis on the countries of the E³UDRES2 alliance

AI summary Read the abstract

This study analyzes plastic waste management across nine European university alliance countries using bibliometric analysis and mass balance calculations, finding that while Latvia and Finland lead in recycling rates, significant gaps remain between scientific research progress and actual circular economy policy implementation across Europe.

Article Tier 2

Scientometric analysis and scientific trends on microplastics research

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers performed a scientometric analysis of microplastics research using 2,872 publications from the Web of Science database spanning 2004 to 2020. The bibliometric analysis mapped contributing countries, institutions, key authors, trending keywords, and future research directions in the field. The study found that microplastics research has grown rapidly, with increasing attention to environmental pollution across various ecosystems.

Review Tier 2

Research Trends on The Presence of Microplastic Particles in The Environment and The Impact of Microplastics Around the World From 2010 - 2022: A Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis

AI summary Read the abstract

This literature review and bibliometric analysis maps global research trends on microplastic pollution and its environmental and health impacts from 2010 to 2022. Publication rates have increased dramatically over the period, with most research focused on marine and freshwater contamination. The study provides a useful overview of where microplastic science has grown and where gaps remain.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper