0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Remediation Sign in to save

Enhancing the remediation of polyamide microplastics: A comparative study of natural and synthetic coagulants

Frontiers in Environmental Science 2025 4 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 58 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Devananth Ramakrishnan, Mahenthiran Sathiyamoorthy

Summary

Researchers compared natural plant-based coagulants with the synthetic coagulant alum for removing polyamide microplastics from water. They found that alum was more effective overall, removing up to 94% of microplastics, while the natural coagulants achieved moderate removal rates and worked best with larger particles. The study suggests that coagulation-based water treatment can meaningfully reduce microplastic contamination, with natural alternatives offering a more sustainable option.

Polymers

Polyamide microplastics, which originate from textiles, industrial processes, and everyday consumer products, contaminate waterways, threatening aquatic life, human health, and the environment, emphasizing the urgent need for effective removal technology and sustainable mitigation strategies. This study explores the removal of polyamide microplastics using a coagulation-flocculation- sedimentation (CFS) approach, comparing the effectiveness of natural coagulants (Strychnos potatorum and Cicer arietinum) with the synthetic coagulant alum. The methodology involved optimizing coagulant dosages (50–300 mg/L) and applying a CFS process with rapid mixing (100 rpm, 1 min), slow mixing (30 rpm, 30 min), and sedimentation (30 min). Two sizes of polyamide MPs (<500 μm and >500 μm) were evaluated. The results showed that Strychnos potatorum and Cicer arietinum achieved higher removal efficiencies (up to 92.6% ± 3.21%) for smaller polyamide microplastics (<500 μm) than did alum (up to 87.6% ± 6.5%). Conversely, alum demonstrated superior removal efficiency (up to 91.33% ± 4.16%) for larger polyamide microplastics (>500 μm) compared with Cicer arietinum and Strychnos potatorum (up to 79.6% ± 4.72%). To assess real-world applicability, the method was tested using natural water from Muttukadu Lake. In this more complex matrix, Strychnos potatorum maintained high removal efficiencies, achieving 91.33% ± 3.05% for <500 μm MP and 86.66% ± 3.05% for >500 μm MP, outperforming alum, which showed reduced performance (82.3% ± 9.07% and 78.6% ± 9.50% for small and large MPs, respectively). Cicer arietinum demonstrated moderate efficiency (79.33% ± 4.16% and 76.66% ± 8.6%, respectively), with some sensitivity to natural matrix interference. This study reveals the potential of natural coagulants as viable and sustainable alternatives to synthetic coagulants for the removal of polyamide microplastics, particularly those of smaller sizes. These findings can inform green infrastructure design, enhance environmental sustainability, reduce microplastic pollution, and protect public health, paving the way for innovative, eco-friendly treatment technologies.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Sustainable coagulative removal of microplastic from aquatic systems: recent progress and outlook

This review examines how natural coagulants from plants, animals, and microbes can be used to remove microplastics from water as a greener alternative to conventional chemical treatments. These bio-based coagulants, especially when combined with nanotechnology, show promising removal rates while avoiding the toxic residues left by traditional chemical approaches.

Article Tier 2

Coagulative removal of microplastics from aqueous matrices: Recent progresses and future perspectives

This review examines how coagulation, a common water treatment technique, can be used to remove microplastics from water. Researchers compared the effectiveness of different coagulants, finding that natural options like chitosan and protein-based coagulants achieved removal rates above 90 percent. The study highlights the promise of natural coagulants as a more sustainable approach to tackling microplastic contamination in water treatment systems.

Systematic Review Tier 1

Natural-based coagulants/flocculants for microplastics and nanoplastics removal via coagulation–flocculation: a systematic review

This systematic review evaluates how natural plant-based materials can be used to remove microplastics and nanoplastics from water through coagulation and flocculation processes. The findings show that these sustainable, nature-derived alternatives can effectively capture plastic particles during water treatment, offering a greener approach to reducing microplastic contamination in our drinking water.

Article Tier 2

Enhancing microplastic removal from natural water using coagulant aids

Researchers tested different chemical treatments for removing microplastic beads from natural water and found that polyaluminium chloride combined with polyacrylamide achieved over 95% removal across six common plastic types. The treatment worked on particles ranging from 10 to 1,000 micrometers, and natural organic matter in the water actually improved performance. The findings suggest that optimizing standard water treatment processes could be a practical way to reduce microplastic contamination in drinking water sources.

Article Tier 2

Removal of Pristine and UV-Weathered Microplastics from Water: Moringa oleifera Seed Protein as a Natural Coagulant

Researchers tested a natural plant-based coagulant from Moringa oleifera seeds for removing microplastics from water, comparing it to conventional chemical treatments. The natural coagulant effectively removed both fresh and UV-weathered polyethylene microplastics, performing comparably to synthetic alternatives. This approach offers a more eco-friendly and less toxic option for cleaning microplastics from water systems.

Share this paper