We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Perceptions of change in the environment caused by the COVID-19 pandemic: Implications for environmental policy
AI summary Read the abstract
A global survey of over 2,000 adults found that while people noticed the environment "healing" during COVID lockdowns (cleaner air, quieter streets), they largely overlooked the downsides, like the surge in plastic waste from masks, gloves, and online shopping packaging. This gap between what people perceived and what actually happened matters because that extra plastic waste can break down into microplastics that end up in our water, food, and bodies. The takeaway: public awareness doesn't always match reality, so governments need solid data (not just public opinion) to shape smart environmental policies going forward.
COVID-19 lockdown measures have impacted the environment with both positive and negative effects. However, how human populations have perceived such changes in the natural environment and how they may have changed their daily habits have not been yet thoroughly evaluated. The objectives of this work were to investigate (1) the social perception of the environmental changes produced by the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown and the derived change in habits in relation to i) waste management, energy saving, and sustainable consumption, ii) mobility, iii) social inequalities, iv) generation of noise, v) utilization of natural spaces, and, vi) human population perception towards the future, and (2) the associations of these potential new habits with various socio-demographic variables. First, a SWOT analysis identified strengths (S), weaknesses (W), opportunities (O), and threats (T) generated by the pandemic lockdown measures. Second, a survey based on the aspects of the SWOT was administered among 2370 adults from 37 countries during the period from February to September 2021. We found that the short-term positive impacts on the natural environment were generally well recognized. In contrast, longer-term negative effects arise, but they were often not reported by the survey participants, such as greater production of plastic waste derived from health safety measures, and the increase in e-commerce use, which can displace small storefront businesses. We were able to capture a mismatch between perceptions and the reported data related to visits to natural areas, and generation of waste. We found that age and country of residence were major contributors in shaping the survey participants ´answers, which highlights the importance of government management strategies to address current and future environmental problems. Enhanced positive perceptions of the environment and ecosystems, combined with the understanding that livelihood sustainability, needs to be prioritized and would reinforce environmental protection policies to create greener cities. Moreover, new sustainable jobs in combination with more sustainable human habits represent an opportunity to reinforce environmental policy.
More Papers Like This
The long-term impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on environmental health: a review study of the bi-directional effect
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers reviewed how the COVID-19 pandemic created a two-way relationship with environmental health, finding that lockdowns temporarily improved air and water quality while simultaneously driving a surge in single-use plastic waste and biohazard materials. The review calls for long-term sustainability policies that balance economic recovery with environmental protection, including reducing plastic pollution.
Positive and negative impacts of COVID-19 on the environment: A critical review with sustainability approaches
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines both the positive and negative environmental impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. While lockdowns temporarily reduced air, water, and noise pollution, the massive increase in disposable masks, gloves, and plastic packaging created a surge in microplastic contamination. The study highlights how the pandemic exposed the tension between public health measures and environmental sustainability.
Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the environment, waste management, and energy sectors: a deeper look into the long-term impacts
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines the environmental consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, finding that while short-term air quality improvements occurred during lockdowns, the long-term negative effects are far more significant. Researchers documented massive increases in single-use plastic waste from masks, gloves, and packaging, contributing substantially to microplastic pollution. The study highlights that the pandemic reversed progress on waste reduction and created new challenges for environmental management across waste, energy, and pollution sectors.
Implications of COVID-19 pandemic on environmental compartments: Is plastic pollution a major issue?
AI summary Read the abstract
This study assessed the effects of polystyrene microplastics on liver function and lipid metabolism in exposed mice, finding hepatic lipid accumulation, elevated liver enzymes, and altered expression of genes involved in fatty acid metabolism. The results suggest that chronic microplastic ingestion may contribute to metabolic liver disease through disruption of lipid homeostasis.
Environmental Choices Vs. COVID-19 Pandemic Fear – Plastic Governance Re-assessment
AI summary Read the abstract
A plastic governance study conducted before COVID-19 found strong public support for phasing out single-use plastics, but the pandemic shifted perceptions, with health safety concerns making consumers demand more single-use plastic products. The authors call for re-evaluation of plastic governance strategies to accommodate the changed value hierarchies that emerged during the health crisis.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.