0
Article Tier 2 Sign in to save

Degradation of commercial biodegradable plastics and temporal dynamics of associated bacterial communities in soils: A microcosm study

Toxics 2022 35 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

"Biodegradable" plastic bags and mulch films didn't fully break down in soil even after a full year, they lost less than half their weight, with the easy-to-digest starch component vanishing quickly while the plastic-based ingredients lingered much longer. This matters because it shows these products may not disappear from farmland as fast as marketing suggests, meaning plastic residues (and the soil bacteria disrupted by them) could stick around and potentially affect soil health and the food grown in it longer than expected.

Biodegradable plastics (BDPs) have been introduced to replace conventional fossil-based non-biodegradable plastics in agricultural production to reduce the accumulation of plastic debris in soils. However, the degradation performance of commercially available BDP products in real soils and the response of soil microbial communities to biodegradation remain unclear. Here, we explored the degradation characteristics of a commercial BDP product (made from starch, polylactic acid (PLA) and polybutylene adipate terephthalate (PBAT)) in different soils in a microcosm system over a period of 360 days. Temporal dynamics of associated bacterial communities in different soil niches (control soil, plastic surface soil and bulk soil (soil without close contact with plastics)) were profiled. Weight loss reached 42.0±1.2% to 48.0±2.2% in different soils after 360 days. The degradation of BDP followed the same pattern in different soils characterized by two distinct stages. In the first stage (day 0-30), BDPs experienced major weight loss (35.8-41.9%) which coincided with a drastic increase in the soil dissolve organic carbon (1.53-2.25 times the control soil) and the forming of distinct bacterial communities in the plastic surface soil. Thermalgravimetric analysis (TGA) and fourier transform infrared (FTIR) analysis confirmed the fast depletion of starch in this stage. In addition, observations with naked eyes and scanning electron microscope confirmed intensive microbial colonization on BDP surfaces. In the second stage (day 30-360), the degradation of remaining PLA and PBAT continued at a relatively slow rate. Meanwhile bacterial communities in the plastic surface soil started to gradually recover from the disturbance caused by fast biodegradation in the first stage in a soil-dependent manner. Our findings indicate that the degradation performance of BDPs was limited by the degradation rate of relatively recalcitrant components and the temporal dynamics of associated soil bacterial communities synchronized with the degradation of BDPs.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Biodegradable mulch films exhibit slower-than-expected degradation with negligible effects on soil microbial communities

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers ran a year-long field trial with seven biodegradable plastic mulch films in the UK, finding that none fragmented into soil microplastics as expected and all degraded far more slowly than current industry standards suggest they should. Despite virtually no measurable impact on soil microbial communities, the results challenge the assumption that biodegradable plastics reliably break down under real farming conditions.

Systematic Review Tier 1

Unravelling the ecological ramifications of biodegradable microplastics in soil environment: A systematic review

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers reviewed 85 studies on biodegradable microplastics in soil, finding that when biodegradable plastics fail to fully break down they can disrupt soil structure, nutrient cycling, and microbial life in ways that depend heavily on concentration and plastic type. The review highlights that "biodegradable" plastics are not a simple fix for microplastic pollution in agricultural soils.

Article Tier 2

The fate of post-use biodegradable PBAT-based mulch films buried in agricultural soil

AI summary Read the abstract

Scientists tracked the breakdown of a biodegradable mulch film in farm soil over 16 months and found that while the film lost more than half its surface area, it released microplastics into the surrounding soil during the process. About 17-23% of the original film material was still recoverable from the soil after nearly 500 days. The study shows that even biodegradable plastics can be a source of microplastic contamination in agricultural soils.

Article Tier 2

Microplastic transport in soil: Insight from long-term field observations

AI summary Read the abstract

Scientists buried three types of plastic (regular plastic, a "compostable" plastic, and a starch-based plastic) in outdoor soil for up to a year to see how they move and break down with real rain and weather. Regular plastic barely broke down and stayed put, while the "biodegradable" and starch-based plastics broke into smaller fragments and traveled deeper into the soil over time. This matters because those breakdown products could eventually seep toward groundwater — a reminder that "biodegradable" plastics don't just disappear, they may just turn into smaller pieces that spread further into the environment we get our water and food from.

Article Tier 2

Bioplastics in agricultural soils: Biodegradability, analytical techniques, and soil microbial impact

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers reviewed the evidence on how bioplastics degrade in agricultural soils, finding that commonly used analytical techniques overestimate biodegradation rates because they measure surface changes rather than full carbon mineralization, meaning biodegradable microplastic residues may persist across seasons under realistic conditions.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper