We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Facemask: Protection or threat?
Summary
Researchers counted nearly 300 discarded face masks littering popular beaches in the Philippines, finding surgical masks were by far the most common type left behind. While masks helped protect people from COVID-19, this study is a reminder that improperly discarded masks are adding to plastic pollution on our coastlines, plastic that can break down into microplastics and eventually make its way into the food chain and water we consume.
Facemasks were widely used as a protection against SARS-COV-2, which significantly reduced COVID-19 transmission during the pandemic. However, concerns have been raised regarding its adverse impacts on human health due to intense use and mismanagement. Although rampant plastic littering was the norm before the pandemic, the magnitude of the problem is worsening as potentially COVID-19-infected facemasks are thrown along the shoreline. This study assessed the discarded facemasks on the most popular beach destinations in Mati City, Davao Oriental, Philippines. A total of N = 284 discarded facemasks were found in a cumulative area of 22,500 m2, with an average density of 8.4 × 10-4 items/m2. The surgical facemask (82 %; n = 234) was the most abundant type of facemask found in the areas, followed by KF94 (16 %; n = 45) and KN95 (2 %; n = 5). The Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) showed significant differences in the visual counts of facemasks on the three beaches (p < 0.05).