We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Decision: Suitability of river plastic monitoring methods for citizen science — R0/PR5
Summary
Researchers evaluated the suitability of four river plastic monitoring methods for citizen science applications through field monitoring and participant surveys in Accra, Ghana, testing visual counting, macroplastic net sampling, microplastic net sampling, and hydrometric measurements. The study found that visual counting was the most accessible method for citizen scientists while identifying key tradeoffs between data quality and ease of implementation across the four techniques.
Rivers act as long-term plastic storage and a pathway for land-based plastic pollution into the ocean. Monitoring river plastic at a global scale remains challenging, with only limited large-scale and long-term monitoring efforts to date. Citizen science approaches may ensure a more continuous basic knowledge of plastic pollution in rivers, which can be used to assess the efficacy of reduction measures. We evaluated the suitability of several river plastic monitoring methods for citizen science, through field monitoring and a subsequent survey with citizen scientists in Accra, Ghana. Four measurement techniques (visual counting, macroplastic net sampling, microplastic net sampling and hydrometric measurements) were tested in the field and evaluated by citizen scientists. The visual counting method, used to estimate floating macroplastic transport, emerged as the most promising method for citizen science–based river plastic monitoring. Using the data collected by citizens, we quantify the variability in transport and concentration of both macroplastic and microplastic.
Sign in to start a discussion.