0
Review ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Sign in to save

Zürich II Statement on Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs): Scientific and Regulatory Needs

Food Research International 2024 42 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Jamie C. DeWitt, Juliane Glüge, Ian T. Cousins, Gretta Goldenman, Dorte Herzke, Rainer Lohmann, Mark F. Miller, Carla A. Ng, Sharyle Patton, Xenia Trier, Lena Vierke, Zhanyun Wang, Sam Adu-Kumi, Simona Bălan, Andreas M. Buser, Tony Fletcher, Line Småstuen Haug, Audun Heggelund, Jun Huang, Sarit Kaserzon, Juliana Leonel, Ishmail Sheriff, Yali Shi, Sara Valsecchi, Martin Scheringer

Summary

Researchers from 18 countries convened to assess progress on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), finding that while health effect understanding and regulatory limits have improved significantly, analytical methods still cover only ~50 of thousands of PFAS compounds and greater global cooperation on emissions monitoring and grouping-based regulation is urgently needed.

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are a class of synthetic organic chemicals of global concern. A group of 36 scientists and regulators from 18 countries held a hybrid workshop in 2022 in Zürich, Switzerland. The workshop, a sequel to a previous Zürich workshop held in 2017, deliberated on progress in the last five years and discussed further needs for cooperative scientific research and regulatory action on PFASs. This review reflects discussion and insights gained during and after this workshop and summarizes key signs of progress in science and policy, ongoing critical issues to be addressed, and possible ways forward. Some key take home messages include: 1) understanding of human health effects continues to develop dramatically, 2) regulatory guidelines continue to drop, 3) better understanding of emissions and contamination levels is needed in more parts of the world, 4) analytical methods, while improving, still only cover around 50 PFASs, and 5) discussions of how to group PFASs for regulation (including subgroupings) have gathered momentum with several jurisdictions proposing restricting a large proportion of PFAS uses. It was concluded that more multi-group exchanges are needed in the future and that there should be a greater diversity of participants at future workshops.

Share this paper