We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Goodbye Plastic Bags? Lessons from the Shopping Plastic Bag Ban in Chile
AI summary Read the abstract
Analysis of Chile's single-use plastic bag ban found it reduced approximately 249 kilotons of shopping bag consumption and shifted the market toward paper bags, but also triggered a 50% increase in bin liner sales as consumers purchased replacements for the bags they previously reused. Despite these unintended substitution effects, the study found an average 38% reduction in environmental impact across 15 of 18 assessed categories, supporting the ban's overall environmental effectiveness.
Bans on single-use plastic shopping bags (SUPBs) are a popular policy to tackle plastic pollution. However, their success has been evaluated solely based on reduced SUPBs consumption, ignoring the impacts of substitutes. This article addresses this gap by analyzing the Chilean plastic bag ban law. Results show a reduction of ~249 kilotons of SUPBs consumed and a change in the materiality of shopping bags (mainly toward paper), but also an increase of more than 50% of bin liners after the enactment of the ban. Despite some undesired effects, an improvement in the environmental performance of the bag market is obtained in fifteen of the eighteen categories studied. The environmental impacts are on average 38% lower than in the counterfactual scenario. This suggests that the law is being effective in protecting the environment. The strictness of the ban and its rapid enforcement were positive aspects of its design, but ignoring the end-of-life of the bags could be limiting its impact. To reduce the environmental impact of substitutes, it is recommended to create design guidelines for shopping bags and bin liners.
More Papers Like This
Some Countries Can Say “No!” to Single-Use Plastics, Others Cannot: Why Do Seemingly Similar Policies Have Different Outcomes?
AI summary Read the abstract
This paper analyzed plastic bag ban and levy outcomes across 12 countries, finding that retail sector engagement—rather than the specific policy instrument—was the strongest predictor of success. Countries that failed to involve major retailers, provide affordable alternatives, or implement deposit-return systems often saw limited reductions in single-use plastic consumption.
Impact of Single-Use Plastic Regulation on Ecuadorian Imports: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis of Customs Records, 2014–2025
AI summary Read the abstract
When Ecuador banned certain single-use plastics, imports of plastic waste dropped to zero, but imports of everyday plastic items like bags, packaging, and tableware actually kept growing instead of shrinking. This suggests that plastic bans on paper don't always translate into less plastic in the real world, which matters because these products are a major source of the microplastics increasingly found in our food, water, and even our bodies, meaning stronger or better-enforced policies may be needed to actually reduce human exposure.
The paradox of plastic bag legislation: How bans and taxes affect PM2.5 air pollution in 208 countries
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers analyzed plastic bag regulations in 208 countries and found that outright bans generally reduce fine particle (PM2.5) air pollution, while plastic bag taxes unexpectedly increase it — likely because alternative bags require more energy-intensive production. The findings reveal that poorly designed plastic policies can create unintended environmental trade-offs.
Effectiveness of intervention on behaviour change against use of non-biodegradable plastic bags: a systematic review
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers systematically reviewed government policies aimed at reducing single-use plastic bag consumption, finding that outright bans and higher consumer taxes are significantly more effective than regulations based only on bag thickness. The results show that well-designed public policy can shift consumer behavior toward more sustainable choices, though the behavioral changes can fade without ongoing reinforcement.
Evaluating plastic bag levies: A systematic review of behavioural, regulatory, and normative pathways
AI summary Read the abstract
This systematic review following PRISMA 2020 guidelines evaluated the effectiveness of plastic bag levies and related interventions across 16 eligible studies. Findings showed economic instruments like levies produce the largest and most consistent reductions in plastic bag consumption, while multi-layered strategies combining charges with education and social norms offer the greatest long-term effectiveness.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.