We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Occurrence, Concentration, and Distribution of 35 PFASs and Their Precursors Retained in 20 Stormwater Biofilters
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers analyzed 35 per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and their precursors in 20 urban stormwater biofilter systems, revealing complex fate and transport behaviors that suggest current biofilter designs are insufficient to fully capture these persistent chemicals before they enter waterways.
Current knowledge about the fate and transport behaviors of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in urban stormwater biofilter facilities is very limited. C5-14,16 perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids [perfluorinated carboxylic acids (PFCAs)], C4,8,10 perfluoroalkanesulfonic acids (PFSAs), methyl-perfluorooctane sulfonamide acetic acid (MeFOSAA, a PFSA precursor), and unknown C6-8 PFCA and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid precursors were frequently found in bioretention media and forebay sediments at Σ35PFAS concentrations of <0.03-19 and 0.064-16 μg/kg-DW, respectively. Unknown C6-8 PFCA precursor concentrations were up to ten times higher than the corresponding PFCAs, especially at forebays and biofilters' top layer. No significant trend could be attributed to PFAS and precursor concentrations versus depth of filter media, though PFAS concentrations were 2-3 times higher in the upper layers on average (significant difference between the upper (0-5 cm) and deepest (35-50 cm) layer). PFASs had a similar spatial concentration distribution in each filter media (no clear difference between short- and long-chain PFASs). Commercial land use and organic matter were important factors explaining the concentration variations among the biofilters and between the sampling depths, respectively. Given the comparable PFAS accumulations in deeper and superficial layers and possible increased mobility after precursor biotransformation, designing shallow-depth, nonamended sand biofilters or maintaining only the top layer may be insufficient for stormwater PFAS management.
More Papers Like This
Impacts of treatment extent on Per-and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) discharge in wet-weather flows
AI summary Read the abstract
PFAS occurrence, composition, and precursor contributions were studied in wastewater treatment plant effluents and stormwater discharges across six Iowa cities using targeted analysis. Nine PFAS compounds were detected across sites, with PFAA precursors representing a significant portion of PFAS load in stormwater, highlighting the inadequacy of conventional treatment for PFAS removal.
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in Canadian municipal wastewater and biosolids: Recent patterns and time trends 2009 to 2021
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers analyzed 42 per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) across 27 Canadian wastewater treatment plants from 2009 to 2021, finding that while long-chain PFAS like PFOA declined following industrial phase-outs, PFOS levels remained stubbornly persistent and short-chain replacement PFAS concentrations consistently increased.
Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in Urban Stormwater Runoff: Insights from a Roadside Rain Garden
AI summary Read the abstract
This study quantifies PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance) concentrations in urban stormwater runoff, tracing how these persistent synthetic chemicals accumulate in city drainage systems. Researchers identified multiple PFAS compounds across sampled sites, with levels varying by land use and infrastructure type. The results highlight stormwater as a significant pathway for PFAS to enter surface water and potentially drinking water supplies.
Sewage sludge biochars as effective PFAS-sorbents
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers found sewage sludge biochars perform comparably to commercial activated carbon for PFAS removal, though competitive sorption between congeners significantly reduces effectiveness in mixed-contaminant scenarios.
Exploration of PFAS Mass Discharge in Stormwater Versus Groundwater: Technical and Regulatory Considerations
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers modeled PFAS mass discharge pathways at aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) sites and compiled field PFOS concentration data, finding that stormwater typically contributes less PFAS mass than groundwater but still warrants site-specific management due to its faster transport timescales and proximity to diverse water receptors.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.