We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Monitoring macroplastics in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems: Expert survey reveals visual and drone-based census as most effective techniques
AI summary Read the abstract
A survey of 46 plastic pollution researchers found that traditional visual census and drone-based UAV surveys were rated as the most effective methods for monitoring macroplastic litter in riverine and marine environments, while satellite imagery and GPS/GNSS trackers received lower scores due to limited field validation and short performance ranges. The study provides a researcher-based assessment framework to guide selection of monitoring approaches and support global harmonization of macroplastic monitoring protocols.
Anthropogenic litter, such as plastic, is investigated by the global scientific community from various fields employing diverse techniques. The goal is to assess and finally mitigate the pollutants' impacts on the natural environment. Plastic litter can accumulate in different matrices of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, impacting both biota and ecosystem functioning. Detection and quantification of macroplastics, and other litter, can be realized by jointly using visual census and remote sensing techniques. The primary objective of this research was to identify the most effective approach for monitoring macroplastic litter in riverine and marine environments through a comprehensive survey based on the experiences of the scientific community. Researchers involved in plastic pollution evaluated four litter occurrence and flux investigation methods (visual census, drone-based surveys, satellite imagery, and GPS/GNSS trackers) through a questionnaire. Traditional visual census and drone deployment were deemed as the most popular approaches among the 46 surveyed researchers, while satellite imagery and GPS/GNSS trackers received lower scores due to limited field validation and short performance ranges, respectively. On a scale from 0 to 5, visual census and drone-based surveys obtained 3.5 and 2.0, respectively, whereas satellite imagery and alternative solutions received scores lower than 1.2. Visual and drone censuses were used in high, medium and low-income countries, while satellite census and GPS/GNSS trackers were mostly used in high-income countries. This work provides an overview of the advantages and drawbacks of litter investigation techniques, contributing i) to the global harmonization of macroplastic litter monitoring and ii) providing a starting point for researchers and water managers approaching this topic. This work supports the selection and design of reliable and cost-effective monitoring approaches to mitigate the ambiguity in macroplastic data collection, contributing to the global harmonization of macroplastic litter monitoring protocols.
More Papers Like This
Remote sensing and image analysis of macro-plastic litter: A review
AI summary Read the abstract
This systematic review synthesized recent advances in remote sensing and AI-driven image analysis for detecting macro-plastic litter in coastal, riverine, and aquatic environments using platforms from webcams to satellites. The review found considerable variability in quantification metrics and highlighted the urgent need for methodological standardization to enable cross-study comparisons and evidence-based policymaking.
Visual Observation to Detect Macroplastic Object in River: A Review of Current Knowledge
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines visual observation methods for detecting macroplastic objects in rivers, using a systematic approach to assess current research trends, methodologies, and future directions in riverine plastic monitoring. Researchers found that visual observation is a widely used and adaptable method for measuring plastic quantity, composition, and distribution, though standardization gaps limit cross-study comparisons and effective mitigation strategy design.
Evaluation of riverine macro- and mesoplastic monitoring approaches.
AI summary Read the abstract
This review evaluated and compared existing monitoring approaches for riverine macro- and mesoplastics, identifying key methodological inconsistencies that limit cross-study comparisons and calling for standardization to improve understanding of plastic transport and accumulation in freshwater river systems.
Measuring riverine macroplastic: Methods, harmonisation, and quality control
AI summary Read the abstract
This critical review examined methods for measuring macroplastic flows in rivers, finding substantial variability in approaches and reporting that limits comparability across studies. The authors call for methods testing, harmonized quality assurance procedures, and standardized data reporting to support a rigorous evidence base for global plastic pollution reduction efforts including the forthcoming treaty.
Aerial Remote Sensing of Aquatic Microplastic Pollution: The State of the Science and How to Move It Forward
AI summary Read the abstract
A systematic literature review of aerial remote sensing for aquatic microplastic detection identified three main approaches — spectral characteristics, floating debris imaging, and AI-based analysis — all still largely experimental rather than operational.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.