0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Analysis of Microplastic Contamination in Vaname Shrimp (Litopenaeus Vannamei) with Different Cultivation Methods

International Journal of Marine Engineering Innovation and Research 2025 Score: 38 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Puji Hastuti, Anggun Rahadian Kusuma Dewi, Defri Yona, Muhammad Mahmudi

Summary

Researchers analyzed microplastic contamination across three different vaname shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) cultivation methods, sampling water, sediment, commercial feed, and shrimp tissues over three months. The study aimed to identify which cultivation system introduces more microplastics into the production environment and assess potential contamination routes for farmed shrimp.

Body Systems
Study Type Environmental

Vaname shrimp cultivation is inseparable from the use of plastic. Plastic will fragment into microplastics and pollute the environment. Water sources and cultivation methods are often the source of microplastics entering the cultivation environment. This study aims to determine microplastic pollution in three different cultivation methods, seen from the presence of microplastics in water, sediment, commercial feed, and whiteleg shrimp. Sampling was carried out for three months of December 2024 - February 2025 by testing microplastics in water, sediment, feed, gill organs, and the digestive tract of whiteleg shrimp during one cultivation cycle. The microplastics found amounted to 1,593 particles, 877 particles in water, 561 particles in sediment, 53 particles in feed, and 102 particles in shrimp samples. The microplastics found were in the form of films, fragments, fibers, and pellets with sizes between 10-600 micrometer. The average abundance of microplastics in water and sediment fluctuates depending on geographical and weather conditions. Microplastics in feed indicate the presence of microplastic sources from the monthly feeding process. Meanwhile, the abundance of microplastics in shrimp accumulates every month. The differences in microplastic abundance in the three methods indicate the presence of microplastic pollution originating from cultivation equipment, commercial feed, and water sources that have been contaminated with microplastics.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Temporal variability of microplastics in shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei), feed, water and sediments of coastal and inland culture ponds

This study tracked microplastic contamination in farmed shrimp, their feed, water, and pond sediment across 12 shrimp farms in India over a four-month growing period. Microplastics were found in over 93% of shrimp samples, with feed identified as the primary source of contamination. Since shrimp are one of the most widely consumed seafood products globally, these findings raise concerns about microplastic exposure for consumers.

Article Tier 2

Microplastic study on (litopenaeus vannamei) cultivation enterprises on the east coast of aceh

Researchers sampled vannamei shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) from three cultivation stations on Aceh's east coast (Pidie, Pidie Jaya, and Bireuen) and analyzed microplastic content using H2O2/H2SO4 digestion and microscopy at 40x magnification. They found fiber and film microplastics in all shrimp samples, with the highest count (13 particles) at the Pidie station, indicating microplastic contamination has entered commercial aquaculture supply chains.

Article Tier 2

Characterization of Microplastic Contamination of Whiteleg Shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) Cultivation in North Lombok, Indonesia

Researchers characterized microplastic contamination in farmed whiteleg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei), measuring particle abundance, size distribution, polymer types, and potential human dietary exposure through shrimp consumption. Microplastics were found throughout shrimp tissues, with implications for seafood safety.

Article Tier 2

Farmed stage (age)-dependent accumulation and size of microplastics in Litopenaeus vannamei shrimp reared in a super-intensive controlled system

Researchers tracked microplastic accumulation in farmed shrimp over their entire growth cycle and found that both the number and size of microplastic particles increased as the shrimp grew older. Shrimp raised in super-intensive indoor systems had higher microplastic contamination than those from traditional ponds or wild environments, likely due to the extensive plastic materials used in the farming infrastructure. Since shrimp is widely consumed seafood, these findings mean that people eating farmed shrimp are likely consuming microplastics that accumulated throughout the animals' lives.

Article Tier 2

Growth of Vannamei Shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) in Intensive Cultivation Systems

Not relevant to microplastics — this descriptive study tracks the growth performance and water quality parameters in intensive Litopenaeus vannamei (vannamei shrimp) aquaculture ponds in Indonesia.

Share this paper