We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Liquid crystal monomers in human, dog and cat feces from the United States
AI summary Read the abstract
Chemicals used in digital screens (called liquid crystal monomers, found in TVs, phones, and computers) are showing up in the feces of humans, dogs, and cats, meaning we're all being exposed to them somehow, likely through household dust or everyday contact with electronics. Humans had notably higher levels than pets, and while scientists don't yet know if these chemicals harm our health, this study is one of the first to show that exposure is real and widespread, making it a good candidate for future research, much like the ongoing concerns about microplastics in our bodies.
Little is known about exposure of humans and companion animals to liquid crystal monomers (LCMs), which are extensively used in digital displays. We determined the concentrations of 52 LCMs in feces of humans, pet dogs and cats from New York State, USA, using gas chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (GC-HRMS). Twenty-four, eight, and six LCMs, that were mainly fluorinated, were detected in human, dog, and cat feces, respectively. ∑LCMs concentrations in the feces of humans (mean: 8.01 ng/g dry weight [dw]) were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than those of dogs (mean: 1.82 ng/g dw) and cats (mean: 1.24 ng/g dw) and with concentrations measured as high as 39.8 ng/g dw. Rel-4'-((1r,1'r,4 R,4'R)-4'-ethyl-[1,1'-bi(cyclohexan)]-4-yl)-3,4-difluoro-1,1'-biphenyl (RELEEBCH or 2bcHdFB) was found at the highest detection frequency (DF) among LCMs analyzed in human (DF: 89 %), dog (DF: 28 %), and cat (DF: 50 %) feces, although this compound accounted only < 4 % of ∑LCM concentrations. The mean cumulative daily intakes of ∑LCMs, calculated through a reverse dosimetry approach, were 71.7, 87.5, and 10.7 ng/kg body weight (bw)/day for humans, dogs, and cats, respectively. This study provides evidence of exposure of both humans and pets to LCMs, highlighting the importance of assessing sources of exposure and associated health risks.
More Papers Like This
Polyethylene Terephthalate and Polycarbonate Microplastics in Pet Food and Feces from the United States
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers measured PET and polycarbonate microplastics in pet food and pet feces from the United States. They found that microplastic concentrations in cat and dog feces were one to two orders of magnitude higher than in their food, suggesting that diet is only a minor source of pet microplastic exposure. The findings indicate that pets, like humans, are exposed to microplastics through multiple pathways in their shared living environments.
A review on microplastics in mammalian feces: Monitoring techniques and associated challenges
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers reviewed how microplastics appear in the feces of humans, dogs, cats, and marine mammals, finding PET plastic to be the most common type across species. Analyzing feces offers a non-invasive way to track how much plastic organisms are ingesting, which could help guide environmental health policies.
Pets, Genuine Tools in Detecting Environmental Pollutants. Sentinels and Biomonitors
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines how pet dogs and cats serve as unintentional early-warning sentinels for human exposure to environmental pollutants, including microplastics. Because pets share our homes and have shorter lifespans, they develop pollutant-related diseases faster than humans do — making them valuable biomonitors for chemicals we are all being exposed to. The paper highlights that pets show elevated levels of flame retardants, perfluorochemicals, and other contaminants compared to their owners, underscoring shared household and environmental exposure risks.
Presence of Microplastic-like Structures in a University Community and Its Companion Animals, from Bogotá-Colombia: An Exploratory Study
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers in Colombia found tiny plastic-like particles in the poop of almost every person and pet they tested, 97.78% of humans and 100% of dogs and cats. Interestingly, people's microplastic levels didn't match their own pets' levels, suggesting we're not just picking up plastics from our shared homes, but likely from different sources like our specific foods, water, or daily habits. This is a small first-look study, but it adds to growing evidence that microplastics are basically everywhere in our bodies, and scientists are still working out exactly where they come from and what that means for our health.
A plastic diet for pets: Exploratory evidence of microplastics in commercial dry pet food in Spain
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers detected microplastics in all five commercial dry pet food brands tested in Spain, with dog food containing more than twice the particle count of cat food, and developed a risk index model suggesting dogs face greater systemic exposure risk while cats may be more prone to chronic intestinal inflammation from fiber-type particles — positioning pets as sentinels for household microplastic exposure.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.